Associate Professor, Allameh Tabataba’i University (ATU), Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Observing more complexity in organization working life has become inevitable. In addition, population growth, needs, and clients expectations have led organizations to automate their working systems and procedures. This study concentrated on two different types of organizations which utilized different systems and means of work operations: progressive and automated means of operations as opposed to mechanical and /or traditional means of work implementation and performance. Testing hypotheses and research findings gathered from four different types of organizations indicated that organizations which utilize information technology and better Administrative automation meet their predetermined goals and objectives more effectively and significantly
رضائیان، علی، (1382) مدیر عصر اطلاعات، نشریه پیام مدیریت.
رضایی، اکبر، (1380)، تحولات اینترنت و IT، ماهنامه آموزش و اطلاع رسانی، شماره 10،.
زاهدی، شمس السادات، یعقوبی، نور محمد، (1383)، باز آفرینی دولت در عصر اطلاعات، فصلنامه مدیریت، شماره 6،)
زاهدی، شمس السادات و زند رحیمی، نادر، (1385)،" الگوی کاربرد فناوری اطلاعات در تصمیم گیری مدیران در شرکت مخابرات ایران" فصلنامه علوم مدیریت ایران، شماره1،.
سلجوقی، خسرو، (1380)، اتوماسیون اداری، تهران، سازمان مدیریت و برنامه ریزی کشور،.
منوریان، عباس، (1380)، سازمانهای مناسب با عصر اطلاعات، نشریه مدیریت دولتی، شماره 36 و37،.
مشایخی، علینقی و دیگران (1384)، "بررسی عوامل کلیدی مؤثر بر کاربرد فناوری اطلاعات: کاربرد روش دلفی، فصلنامه مدرس علوم انسانی، پاییز.
هال، ریچارد، (1376)، سازمان ساختار، فرآیندها و ره آوردها، ترجمه پارسائیان، اعرابی،تهران، انتشارات سمت،.
همر، مایکل، جینر چمپی، (1375 ) طرح ریزی دوباره، ترجمه ایرج پاد، سازمان مدیریت صنعتی،.
هندی، چارلز، (1377) عصر سنت گریزی، مدیریت و سازمان در قرن 21، ترجمه عباس مخبر، انتشارات طرح نو،.
Alter‚ Steven (1999)‚ "Information Systems: A management perspective"‚ Addison Wesley.
Anderson‚ K(2005)‚ “From Information Technology to Knowledge Technology”‚ Journal of Knowledge Management‚ Vol.2.No.2.
Clarke‚ Steven (2001)‚"Information System Strategic Management" Routledge Publishing Co.
Cooper, Randolph B, )2000( information Technology Development creativity, MIS Quarterly, Volume 24 NO2, June.
Davenport.t.h. Short. J E. )1998( “the New industrial engineering: information technology and Process Redesign”, Sloan management Review summer- P11-12,.
Dias Donaldo desouza, (1998) Manager’s motivation for using information technology indastrid management & data system, 1998, “Electronic”.
Holden Norris (2003) “Electronic Government at the lecal leval” Public performance Management Review, Vol 20,.
Hood, C. (1999) office Automation and Public administration..
Kaontz. H.Am Dauial. (1998) Management at al of ready me Grow. Hihbaok co..
LAUDOn,k.and Loudenj. (2002) Management information system prentice- nall.
Martin. Merld. (2000) Management information system,.
Ray ,ch. And janet palmer(1997)Office Automation a system approach South western. Educational publishing third edition,.
Norris‚ D. F.‚ & Campillo‚ D" Factors affecting the adoption of leading information technology by local government" Baltimore MD Maryland Institute for Policy Analysis and Research‚ University of Maryland‚ 2002.
Rockart‚ J.F. (1979)"Chiefexecutives define their own data needs"‚ Harvard Business Review‚ vol.57‚ no2. March-April‚ pp. 81-93‚ 1979
Snellen, I.th. M. and W.vandedowk.(1999) “Public administration In an information Aves. MIS. June 1999.
TURBAN,E(2002) Information Technology for management, willey. Ine. 2002.
Whithman. M.E. Gibson. (1998)“Factors alfeeting the use of information technology in organization” Information resources management journal 1998.
Sharifzadeh,F . (2013). Analyzing the relationship of Administrative automated
level with organizational effectiveness. Business Intelligence Management Studies, 1(2), 73-103.
MLA
Sharifzadeh,F . "Analyzing the relationship of Administrative automated
level with organizational effectiveness", Business Intelligence Management Studies, 1, 2, 2013, 73-103.
HARVARD
Sharifzadeh F. (2013). 'Analyzing the relationship of Administrative automated
level with organizational effectiveness', Business Intelligence Management Studies, 1(2), pp. 73-103.
CHICAGO
F Sharifzadeh, "Analyzing the relationship of Administrative automated
level with organizational effectiveness," Business Intelligence Management Studies, 1 2 (2013): 73-103,
VANCOUVER
Sharifzadeh F. Analyzing the relationship of Administrative automated
level with organizational effectiveness. Business Intelligence Management Studies. 2013;1(2):73-103 (In Persian).