Business Intelligence Management Studies

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Memorandum of Understanding

Article Writing Guide

Files

Reviwers (2020)

Reviwers2022

Consultants

4 - Reviewers 2023

Publons

A Digital Transformation Assessment Maturity Model for Industrial Organization Based on Design Science Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student, IT Management, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Technology Management Department, Faculty of Management and Accounting, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.Corresponding Author: samgh10@hotmail.com

3 Assistant Professor, Technology Management Faculty of Management and Accounting, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad

Abstract

Effecting fundamental changes in all organizational dimensions, digital transformation refers to the aggregation and integration of digital technologies in all areas of an organization. The design science methodology was used in this study to propose a maturity assessment model for digital transformation in industrial organizations. . For data collection in the qualitative phase, a systematic review of the literature was conducted to analyze relevant papers within the 2015–2019 period. As a result, 49 papers were selected. At the same time, the experts were interviewed. Axial and theoretical coding phases were then implemented through the grounded theory in MAXQDA 10 to classify data as four dimensions and 12 categories. Causal conditions, context conditions, intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences were then identified to design the paradigm model. In the quantitative phase, research questionnaires were used for data collection, and the structural equation modeling technique was employed for model testing in SmartPLS. According to the ISO 15504, the capability maturity model for digital transformation was designed at incomplete, initial, performed, managed, established, and optimized levels in order to make research practical, and a corresponding 48-item researcher-made questionnaire was then developed. The proposed model was analyzed in an industrial organization of the electronics sector to determine the organizational maturity level.the result showed that the organization is at the second level of maturity and transformation has begun in it.the focus of the organization has been on the technology aspect and it is necessary to develop organization aspects accordance with them.

Keywords

References
اسفندیاری، مصطفی و ایمان خانی، نیلوفر. (1398). تحلیل رفتار مشتریان صنعت بانک: رهیافت نظریه داده بنیاد. فصلنامه مدل‌سازی اقتصادی. (45)13، 114-.93.
حقیقت منفرد، جلال، طباطبایی، غلامحسن، دادش نیای کاسمانی، روح‌الله. (1398).  مدل پارادایمی معماری فناوری اطلاعات مبتنی بر چارچوب کوبیت 2019. مطالعات مدیریت کسب‌و‌کار هوشمند، سال هفتم، شماره 30، زمستان 98، صفحات 189-222.
موسی خانی، محمد. (1394). روش تحقیق گراندد در مدیریت. نوبت سوم، تهران، نشر فوژان.
نوری، مژگان، شاه‌حسینی، محمدعلی، شامی زنجانی، مهدی، عابدین، بابک. (1398). طراحی چارچوب مفهومی رهبری تحول دیجیتال در سازمان‌های ایرانی. فصلنامه مدیریت اطلاعات، (2)12، 242-211.
References
Abdelaal, I. & Zaki, M. (2018). Digital Business Transformation and Strategy: What Do We Know So Far? Cambridge Service Alliance 2018.
Akdil, K. & Ustundag, A. & Ustundag, S. (2018). Maturity and Readiness Model for Industry 4.0 Strategy. Springer International Publishing,128–142.
Becker, J. Knackstedt, R. & Pöppelbuß, D. W. I. J. (2009). Developing maturity models for IT management. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(3), 213-222.
Berghaus. S. & Back, A. (2019). Stages in Digital Business Transformation: Results of an Empirical Maturity Study. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Berthelsen, C. & Frederiksen, k. (2018). A Comprehensive Example of How to Conduct a Literature Review Following Glaser’s grounded Theory Methodological Approach, International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(1), 90-99.
Brown, N. & Brown, I. (2019). From Digital Business Strategy to Digital Transformation – How A Systematic Literature Review. SAISIT,14, 1-8.
Brozzi, R. & Riedl, M. & Matt, D. (2021). Key Readiness Indicators to Assess The Digital Level of Manufacturing SMEs. 8th CIRP Global Web Conference – Flexible Mass Customisation, 201-206.
Creswell, J.W. Fetters M. D. & Ivankova, N.V. (2004). Designing a mixed methods studyin primary care. Annals of Family Medicine, 2, 7–12.
Culot, G. (2017). Behind the definition of industry 4.0: Analysis and open questions, Int. Journal of Production Economics,226.
Culot, G. Guido. N. & Guido, O. (2020). behind the definition of Industry 4.0: Analysis and open questions. Internatinal Journal of Production Economics, 226.
Esfandiari, M. imankhan, N. (2019). Customer Behavior Analysis of the Bank Industry: Grounded Theory Approach. Economic Modeling, 13(45), 93-114. [In Persian]
Fitzgerald, K. & Bonnet, W. (2014). Embracing Digital Technology: A New Strategic Imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 1-12.
Gökalp, E. & Umat, S. (2017). Development of an Assessment Model for industry4.0. Springer International Publishing AG 2017 A. Mas et al. (Eds.): SPICE 2017, CCIS 770, 128–142.
Haghighat Monfared, J. Tabatabaee, S. Dadashniya Kasmani, R. (2019). A Paradigmatic Model of Information Technology Architecture Based on COBIT 2019 Framework. IT Management Studies, 8(30), 189-222. [In Persian]
Johansson, G. (2018). Digital maturity & operational performance. KTH industrial engineering and management industrial management, 20-119
Lichtblau, K. & Stich,V. Bertenrath, R. & Agnes, M. (2015). IMPULS - Industrie 4.0- Readiness.
Liu.yang, C. S. W. & Chou, T. C. (2011). Resource fit in digital transformation: Lessons learned from the CBC Bank global e-banking project. Management Decision, 49(10), 1728-1742.
Martin, G. & Shar, V. (2018). The digital maturity model 5.0. forrester research, inc.
Mergel, I. & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert Interviws. Government Information Quarterly, 14, 1-8.
Mergel, Ines & Edemann. Noella & Haug, nathlie. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information QuarterlyVolume, 36(4), 30-45.
Milosevic, R. & lukic, D. & durdev, M. & Vukman, j. (2020). Digital transformation of manufacturing towards industry 4.0 concept, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 749(1).
Musa Khani, M. (2014). Grounded research method in management. Third turn, Tehran, Foujan Publishing. [In Persian]
Nouri, M. Shah hoseini, M. Shami zanjani, M. Abedin, B. (2019). Designing A Conceptual Framework for Leading Digital Transformation in Iranian Companies. Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System, 12(2), 211-242. [In Persian]
Osterrider, P. & Budde, L. & Friedli, T. (2020). The smart factory as a key construct of industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Economics, 10 (221), 91-110.
Peffers, k. Tuunanen, T. Rothenberger, M. A. & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A desigh science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of management information systems, 24(3), 45-77
Porter, M. E. & Heppelmann, J. E. (2015). How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Companies. Harvard Business Review, 98–114.
Savić, D. (2020). Digital transformation and grey literature professionals. Grey Journal. 1(16), 11-17.
Singh, A. & Hess, T. (2017). How chief digital officers promote the digital transformation of their companies. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16(1), 1-17.
Steiber, A. & Alänge, S. & Ghosh, S. (2020). Digital transformation of industrial firms: an innovation diffusion perspective. European Journal of Innovation Management.
Steiber.Annika & Alänge.Sve, Digital transformation of industrial firms: an innovation diffusion perspective, European Journal of Innovation Management, 30-40.
Stich, V. & Gadregan, G. (2018). Need and solution to transform the manufacturing industry in the age of IND 4.0. IFIP international federation for information processing 2018 published by Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018. All rights reserved L. M. Camarinha-Matos et al. (Eds.): PRO-VE 2018, IFIP AICT 534, 33–42.
Teichert, R. (2019). Digital Transformation Maturity: A Systematic Review of Literature. ACTA Univesatis Agricultural Silviculture Mendeliamae Brunensis, 1(67),149-160.
Valdez-de-leon, O. Christensen, C. & Valdez-de-leon, O. (2016). A Digital Maturity Model for Telecommunications Service Providers. Technology Innovation.Management Review, 6(8), 19–32.
Venkantraman, N. (1994). IT_enabled business information: From automation to business scope redefinition. Journal of procedia, 52, 161-166.
Venkatraman, V. (2017). The digital matrix: new rules for business transformation through technology. Greystone Books.
Verhoef, P. & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of business research, 2, 80-91.
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. the Journal of strategic information systems. 28, 118-144 (2019)
Warner, k. & wager, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal, Long range planning. 52, 326-349.
Westerman, G. Bonnet, D. & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Press.
‌
 
 
 
 
 
‌ ‌استناد به این مقاله: قلیچ خانی، مصطفی، صمدی مقدم، یحیی، فتحی هفشجانی، کیامرث. (1400). مدل ارزیابی بلوغ تحول دیجیتال در سازمان‌های صنعتی مبتنی بر روش علم طراحی، مطالعات مدیریت کسب وکار هوشمند، 10(37)، 135-184.                                         DOI: 10.22054/ims.2021.53590.1763
 Journal of Business Intelligence Management Studies is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..
Business Intelligence Management Studies
Volume 10, Issue 37
September 2021
Pages 135-184
Files
History
  • Receive Date: 18 October 2020
  • Revise Date: 04 March 2021
  • Accept Date: 07 April 2021
Share
How to cite
Statistics