Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. student, Information Technology Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Islamic Azad University South Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Islamic Azad University South Branch, Tehran, Iran Corresponding Author: ch_valmohammadi@azad.ac.ir

3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University Karaj Branch, Alborz, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economics and Accounting and Director of Management and Economics Department, Modeling and Optimization Research Center in Engineering Sciences, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction

Nowadays, cloud computing has attracted the attention of many organizations. So many of them tend to make their business more agile by using flexible cloud services. Currently, the number of cloud service providers is increasing. In this regard, choosing the most suitable cloud service provider based on the criteria according to the conditions of the service consumer will be considered one of the most important challenges. Relying on previous studies and using a meta-synthesis approach, this research comprehensively searches past researches and provides a comprehensive framework of factors affecting the choice of cloud service providers including 4 main categories and 10 sub-areas. Then, using the opinions of experts who were selected purposefully and using the snowball method, and using the Lawshe validation method, the framework is finalized.
Research Question(s)
This research aims to complete the results of previous studies and answer the following questions with a systematic review of the subject literature:
-What are the components of the comprehensive framework for choosing cloud service providers?
-What are the effective criteria to choose a cloud service provider?
-What is the selected framework of effective factors?

Literature Review

Many researchers have looked at the problem of choosing the best CSP from different aspects and have tried to provide a solution in this field. In this regard, we can refer to "Tang and Liu" (2015) who proposed a model called "FAGI" which defines the choice of a trusted CSP through four dimensions: security functions, auditability, management capability, and Interactivity helps. "Kong et al." (2013) presented an optimization algorithm based on graph theory to facilitate CSP selection. Some researchers have also provided a framework for CSP selection, such as "Gash" (2015) who provides a framework called "SelCSP" with the combination of trustworthiness and competence to estimate the risk of interaction. "Brendvall and Vidyarthi" (2014) suggest that in order to choose the best cloud service provider, a customer must first identify the indicators related to the level of service quality related to him and then evaluate different providers. Some researchers have focused on using different techniques for selection. For example: "Supraya et al." (2016) use the MCDM method to rank based on infrastructure parameters (agility, financial, efficiency, security, and ease of use). They investigate the mechanisms of cloud service recommender systems and divide them into four main categories and their techniques in four features of scalability, accessibility, accuracy, and trust
In this research, it has been tried to use the models and variables of the subject literature in developing a comprehensive framework. The codes, concepts, and categories related to the choice of cloud service providers are extracted from previous studies, and a comprehensive framework of the factors influencing the choice of cloud service providers is presented using the meta-composite method.

Methodology

In this research, based on the "Sandusky and Barroso" meta-composite qualitative research method, which is more general, a systematic review of the research literature was conducted, and the codes in the research literature were extracted. Then the codes, categories, and finally the proposed model are formed. The seven-step method of "Sandusky and Barroso" consists of: formulation of the research question, systematic review of the subject literature, search and selection of suitable articles, extraction of article information, analysis and synthesis of qualitative findings, quality control, and presentation of findings. Lawshe validation method has been used to validate the research findings.

Results

In the meta-synthesis method, all the factors extracted from previous studies are considered as codes and concepts are obtained from the collection of these codes. Using the opinion of experts and considering the concept of each of these codes, codes with similar concepts were placed next to each other and new concepts were formed. This procedure was repeated in converting the concepts into categories and the proposed framework was identified. This framework consists of 27 codes, 10 concepts, and 4 categories (Table 1).
Table 1: Codes, concepts, and categories extracted from the sources













































Hardware and Network Infrastructure


Configuration and Change


































































The lack of a common framework for evaluating cloud service providers is compounded by the fact that no two providers are the same, so that this issue complicates the process of choosing the right provider for each organization. Figure 1 shows the proposed comprehensive framework including 4 categories and 10 concepts covering the issue of choosing cloud service providers. These factors are useful in determining the provider that best matches the personal and organizational needs of the service recipient. The main categories are: trust building, technology, management, and business, which will be explained in the following.
Figure 1: Cloud service provider selection framework
 
5- Conclusion
By comprehensively examining the factors affecting the choice, this research introduces specific areas such as trust building, technology, management, and business as the main areas of cloud service provider selection and add to the previous areas. The category of building trust between the customer, and the cloud service provider is of particular importance. In this research, the concepts related to trust building are: security (including hardware security, network security, software security, confidentiality and control), (availability, stability and stability), and facing threats (technical risk). In 36% of the articles, the concept of trust is mentioned, but in each study, only a limited number of factors affecting this category are discussed. This research takes a comprehensive look at the category of technology, the concepts of productivity (including service delivery efficiency, interactivity), hardware and network infrastructure (including configuration and repair, capacity (memory, processor, disk)), and performance (including flexibility, usability, accuracy of operation, service response time, ease of use). Considering the variety of services on different cloud platforms, service recipients must ensure that the provision of services is managed easily and in the shortest possible time by the cloud provider. The commercial aspect of service delivery deals with the two concepts of customer satisfaction (including responsiveness, customer feedback) and service rates (including: subscription cost and implementation cost), which are of interest to many businesses. The results of this research will help the decision makers of using the cloud space (both organizational managers and cloud customers) in choosing the best cloud service provider to have a comprehensive view of the effective factors before choosing and plan according to their needs.
 
 

Keywords

 
والمحمدی، چنگیز و مظاهری، مریم السادات. (1396). تبیین عوامل تأثیرگذار بر تصمیم به استفاده از رایانش ابری در میان کارکنان سازمان صداوسیما بر مبنای مدل پذیرش فناوری، فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات سال پنجم شماره 19 بهار 96 صفحات 105 تا 124.
References
Achar, R. and P. S. Thilagam (2014). A broker based approach for cloud provider selection. 2014 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/ICACCI. 2014. 6968439.  
Alabool, H. M., & Mahmood, A. K. (2013). Trust-based service selection in public cloud computing using fuzzy modified VIKOR method. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7 (9), 211-220.
Alhamad, M., Dillon, T., & Chang, E. (2011). A trust-evaluation metric for cloud applications. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, 1 (4), 416.
Alhanahnah, M., et al. (2017). "Trusting cloud service providers: trust phases and a taxonomy of trust factors." IEEE Cloud Computing 4 (1): 44-54. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/MCC. 2017. 20
Alhanahnah, M., et al. (2018). "Context-Aware Multifaceted Trust Framework for Evaluating Trustworthiness of Cloud Providers." Future Generation Computer Systems 79: 488-499. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. future. 2017. 09. 071
Aznoli, F., & Navimipour, N. J. (2017). Cloud services recommendation: Reviewing the recent advances and suggesting the future research directions. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 77, 73-86. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jnca. 2016. 10. 009
Baranwal, G. and D. P. Vidyarthi (2014). A framework for selection of best cloud service provider using ranked voting method. Advance Computing Conference (IACC), 2014 IEEE International, IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/IAdCC. 2014. 6779430
Bedi, P., et al. (2012). Trustworthy service provider selection in cloud computing environment. Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT), 2012 International Conference on, IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/CSNT. 2012. 158
Chadwick, B. A., Bahr, H., & Albrecht, S. (1984). Social science research methods Prentice Hall. Inc, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Chahal, R. K. and S. Singh (2016). AHP-Based Ranking of Cloud-Service Providers. Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications, Springer: 491-499. https: //doi. org/ 10. 1007/978-81-322-2755-7_51
Chahal, R. K. and S. Singh (2016). Fuzzy logic and AHP-based ranking of cloud service providers. Computational Intelligence in Data Mining—Volume 1, Springer: 337-346. https: //doi. org/ 10. 1007/978-81-322-2734-2_34
Chahal, R. K. and S. Singh (2017). "Fuzzy rule-based expert system for determining trustworthiness of cloud service providers." International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 19 (2): 338-354. https: //doi. org/10. 1007/s40815-016-0149-1
Chauhan, T., Chaudhary, S., Kumar, V., & Bhise, M. (2011). Service level agreement parameter matching in cloud computing. Paper presented at the Information and Communication Technologies (WICT), 2011 World Congress on. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/WICT. 2011. 6141307
Chen, C. -T., & Lin, K. -H. (2010). A decision-making method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets for cloud service evaluation. Paper presented at the New Trends in Information Science and Service Science (NISS), 2010 4th International Conference on.
Dadhich, M., et al. (2017). Comparison and selection of SaaS service providers using ASMAN framework. Infocom Technologies and Unmanned Systems (Trends and Future Directions) (ICTUS), 2017 International Conference on, IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/ICTUS. 2017. 8286073
De Moraes, L. B., et al. (2018). Exploring evolutive methods for cloud provider selection based on performance indicators. 2018 7th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS), IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/BRACIS. 2018. 00035
Dhivya, R., Devi, R., & Shanmugalakshmi, R. (2016). Parameters and methods used to evaluate cloud service providers: A survey. Paper presented at the Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI), 2016 International Conference on. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/ICCCI. 2016. 7479947
El Zant, B. and M. Gagnaire (2015). "Towards a unified customer aware figure of merit for CSP selection." Journal of Cloud Computing 4 (1): 24. https: //doi. org/10. 1186/s13677-015-0049-1
Elizabeth, B. L., et al. (2014). Trustworthy mechanisms for selecting cloud service providers. Recent Trends in Information Technology (ICRTIT), 2014 International Conference on, IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/ICRTIT. 2014. 6996182
Farshidi, S., et al. (2018). A decision support system for cloud service provider selection problem in software producing organizations. 2018 IEEE 20th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/CBI. 2018. 00024
Gantner, J., et al. (2015). All You Need is Trust–An Analysis of Trust Measures Communicated by Cloud Providers. OTM Confederated International Conferences" On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems", Springer. https: //doi. org/ 10. 1007/978-3-319-26148-5_38
Garg, S. K., Versteeg, S., & Buyya, R. (2013). A framework for ranking of cloud computing services. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29 (4), 1012-1023. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. future. 2012. 06. 006
Ghosh, N., et al. (2015). "SelCSP: A framework to facilitate selection of cloud service providers." IEEE transactions on cloud computing 3 (1): 66-79. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/TCC. 2014. 2328578
Gireesha, O., et al. (2020). "IIVIFS-WASPAS: an integrated multi-criteria decision-making perspective for cloud service provider selection." Future Generation Computer Systems 103: 91-110. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. future. 2019. 09. 053
Halabi, T. and M. Bellaiche (2017). "Towards quantification and evaluation of security of Cloud Service Providers." Journal of Information Security and Applications 33: 55-65. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jisa. 2017. 01. 007
Kang, Y. F., Nie, G. H., Chen, D. L., & Wu, Z. (2013). An optimization algorithm for selecting cloud service partner based on graph theory. Paper presented at the Applied Mechanics and Materials. https: //doi. org/10. 4028/www. scientific. net/AMM. 347-350. 3391
Kousiouris, G., et al. (2017). A Toolkit Based Architecture for Optimizing Cloud Management, Performance Evaluation and Provider Selection Processes. High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS), 2017 International Conference on, IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/HPCS. 2017. 42
Kumar, N. and S. Agarwal (2014). "QoS based Enhanced Model for Ranking Cloud Service Providers." MAGNT Research Report (ISSN. 1444-8939) 2 (6): 32-39. https: //doi. org/10. 1186/s13677-018-0117-4
Kumar, R. R., et al. (2018). A hybrid evaluation framework for qos based service selection and ranking in cloud environment. 2018 15th IEEE India Council International Conference (INDICON), IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/INDICON45594. 2018. 8987192
Lang, M., et al. (2016). What are the most important criteria for cloud service provider selection? A Delphi study. European Conference on Information Systems.
Lang, M., et al. (2018). "Criteria for selecting cloud service providers: a Delphi study of quality-of-service attributes." Information & Management 55 (6): 746-758. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. im. 2018. 03. 004
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity1. Personnel psychology, 28 (4), 563-575.
Maeser III, R. K. (2018). A Model-Based Framework for Analyzing Cloud Service Provider Trustworthiness and Predicting Cloud Service Level Agreement Performance, The George Washington University.
Mahrishi, M., et al. (2019). Selection of Cloud Service Provider Based on Sampled Non-functional Attribute Set. International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, Springer. https: //doi. org/ 10. 1007/978-3-030-49342-4_62
Manzoor, S., Taha, A., & Suri, N. (2016, August). Trust Validation of Cloud IaaS: A Customer-centric Approach. In Trustcom/BigDataSE/I SPA, 2016 IEEE (pp. 97-104).
Moraes, L. B. D., & Fiorese, A. (2017, April). A Scoring Method Based on Criteria Matching for Cloud Computing Provider Ranking and Selection. In International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (pp. 339-365). Springer, Cham. https: //doi. org/10. 1007/978-3-319-93375-7_16
Mouratidis, H., et al. (2013). "A framework to support selection of cloud providers based on security and privacy requirements." Journal of Systems and Software 86 (9): 2276-2293. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jss. 2013. 03. 011
Mukherjee, P., et al. (2020). HHO Algorithm for Cloud Service Provider Selection. 2020 IEEE International Women in Engineering (WIE) Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (WIECON-ECE), IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/WIECON-ECE52138. 2020. 9397936
Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta -ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies (Vol. 11): sage. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Ouedraogo, M., & Mouratidis, H. (2013). Selecting a cloud service provider in the age of cybercrime. Computers & Security, 38, 3-13. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. cose. 2013. 01. 007
Pape, S. and J. Stankovic (2019). An Insight into Decisive Factors in Cloud Provider Selection with a Focus on Security. Computer Security, Springer: 287-306. https: //doi. org/10. 1007/978-3-030-42048-2_19
Patil, K., et al. (2017). "A Framework to Facilitate Selection of Cloud Service Provider." Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research 3 (4).
Pavlidis, M., et al. (2013). Trustworthy selection of cloud providers based on security and privacy requirements: Justifying trust assumptions. International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Digital Business, Springer.. https: //doi. org/10. 1007/978-3-642-40343-9_16
RĂDULESCU, C. Z. and I. C. RĂDULESCU (2017). "An extended TOPSIS approach for ranking cloud service providers." Stud. Inform. Control 26: 183-192. https: //doi. org/10. 24846/v26i2y201706
Rădulescu, C. Z., et al. (2018). A group decision approach based on rough multi-attribute methods for Cloud Services Provider selection. 2018 10th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/ECAI. 2018. 8678966
Ramamurthy, A., et al. (2020). Selection of Cloud Service Providers for Hosting Web Applications in a Multi-cloud Environment. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC), IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/SCC49832. 2020. 00034
Repschläger, J., et al. (2011). Developing a Cloud Provider Selection Model. EMISA.
Ristov, S. and M. Gusev (2015). A methodology to evaluate the trustworthiness of Cloud service providers' availability. EUROCON 2015-International Conference on Computer as a Tool (EUROCON), IEEE, IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/EUROCON. 2015. 7313734
Rizvi, S., et al. (2020). "A fuzzy inference system (FIS) to evaluate the security readiness of cloud service providers." Journal of Cloud Computing 9 (1): 1-17. https: //doi. org/10. 1186/s13677-020-00192-9
Salama, M., et al. (2012). Integrated QoS utility-based model for cloud computing service provider selection. Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops (COMPSACW), 2012 IEEE 36th Annual, IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/COMPSACW. 2012. 18
Sandelowski, M., Barroso, J., (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer Publishing Company, New York.
Sandhya, et al. (2018). "Computational MADM evaluation and ranking of cloud service providers using distance-based approach." International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences 10 (3): 222-234. https: //doi. org/10. 1504/IJIDS. 2018. 093930
Saravanan, M., et al. (2018). "Priority based prediction mechanism for ranking providers in federated cloud architecture." Cluster Computing: 1-9. https: //doi. org/10. 1007/s10586-017-1593-x
Şaykol, A. P. D. E. and A. S. Başer "Analyzing the Important Factors for Cloud Service Provider Selection among the IT firms in Turkey." https: //doi. org/10. 36880/C07. 01654
Shaikh, R. A., & Sasikumar, M. (2014). Dynamic parameter for selecting a cloud service. Paper presented at the Computation of Power, Energy, Information and Communication (ICCPEIC), 2014 International Conference on. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/ICCPEIC. 2014. 6915335
Sidhu, J. and S. Singh (2017). "Design and comparative analysis of MCDM-based multi-dimensional trust evaluation schemes for determining trustworthiness of cloud service providers." Journal of Grid Computing 15 (2): 197-218. https: //doi. org/10. 1007/s10723-017-9396-0
Sidhu, J. and S. Singh (2017). "Improved topsis method based trust evaluation framework for determining trustworthiness of cloud service providers." Journal of Grid Computing 15 (1): 81-105. https: //doi. org/10. 1007/s10723-016-9363-1
Singh, S. and J. Sidhu (2017). "Compliance-based multi-dimensional trust evaluation system for determining trustworthiness of cloud service providers." Future Generation Computer Systems 67: 109-132. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. future. 2016. 07. 013
Somu, N., et al. (2017). "A computational model for ranking cloud service providers using hypergraph based techniques." Future Generation Computer Systems 68: 14-30. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. future. 2016. 08. 014
Souidi, M., et al. (2015). An adaptive real time mechanism for IaaS cloud provider selection based on QoE aspects. Communications (ICC), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/ICC. 2015. 7249411
Supriya, M. (2012). "Estimating trust value for cloud service providers using fuzzy logic. "
Supriya, M. (2020). Cloud Service Provider Selection using Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm. 2020 4th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI) (48184), IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/ICOEI48184. 2020. 9142934
Supriya, M., et al. (2016). "Trustworthy Cloud Service Provider Selection using Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods." Engineering Letters 24 (1).
Tang, C., & Liu, J. (2015). Selecting a trusted cloud service provider for your SaaS program. Computers & Security, 50, 60-73. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. cose. 2015. 02. 001
Tanoumand, N., et al. (2017). Selecting cloud computing service provider with fuzzy AHP. Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 2017 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/ICIINFS. 2016. 8263052
Thasni, T., et al. (2020). Cloud Service Provider Selection Using Fuzzy TOPSIS. 2020 IEEE International Conference for Innovation in Technology (INOCON), IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/INOCON50539. 2020. 9298207
Trabay, D., et al. (2021). "A hybrid technique for evaluating the trust of cloud services." International Journal of Information Technology 13 (2): 687-695. https: //doi. org/10. 1007/s41870-020-00609-3
Tricomi, G., et al. (2020). "Optimal selection techniques for Cloud service providers." IEEE Access. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/ACCESS. 2020. 3035816
Wagle, S. S., et al. (2015). Cloud service providers ranking based on service delivery and consumer experience. Cloud Networking (CloudNet), 2015 IEEE 4th International Conference on, IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/CloudNet. 2015. 7335308
Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of advanced nursing, 50 (2), 204-211.
Waltz, C. F., & Bausell, B. R. (1981). Nursing research: design statistics and computer analysis. Davis Fa.
Wang, Z., Wang, J., Li, B., Liu, Y., & Ma, J. (2016). Online Cloud Provider Selection for QoS-Sensitive Users: Learning with Competition. IAENG International Journal of Computer Science, 43 (3), 1-8.
Wasim, M. U., et al. (2017). Self-Regulated Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: An Autonomous Brokerage-Based Approach for Service Provider Ranking in the Cloud. Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), 2017 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/CloudCom. 2017. 44
Winkler, V. J. (2011). Securing the Cloud: Cloud computer Security techniques and tactics, Elsevier. EBook ISBN: 9781597495936
Zheng, Y. -f. And J. Xu (2014). Multiple attribute decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and application to cloud service provider selection. Information Technology and Electronic Commerce (ICITEC), 2014 2nd International Conference on, IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/ICITEC. 2014. 7105625
Zhengwei, J., et al. (2013). A meta-synthesis approach for cloud service provider selection based on secsla. Computational and Information Sciences (ICCIS), 2013 Fifth International Conference on, IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/ICCIS. 2013. 359
Zoie, R. C., et al. (2016). A decision making framework for weighting and ranking criteria for Cloud provider selection. System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC), 2016 20th International Conference on, IEEE. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/ICSTCC. 2016. 7790730
Reference [in Percian]
Valmohammadi, C., & Mazaheri, M. S. (2017). Clarification of factors affecting the decision to use cloud computing among IRIB employees based on a Technology Acceptance Model. BI Management Studies5 (19), 105-124. https: //doi. org/10. 22054/ims. 2017. 7056
 
 
 
 
استناد به این مقاله: مظاهری، مریم السادات.، والمحمدی، چنگیز.، پورابراهیمی، علیرضا.، ربیعی، مهناز. (1402). چارچوب جامع انتخاب ارائه‌دهندگان خدمات ابری (CSPs) با استفاده از رویکرد فراترکیب، مطالعات مدیریت کسب وکار هوشمند، 11(43)، 217-256.
DOI: 10.22054/IMS.2023.70398.2243
 Journal of Business Intelligence Management Studies is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..v