Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student in Business Management Dept., Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran

2 Professor of Business Management Dept., Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, IranCorresponding Author: khodadad@modares.ac.ir

3 Associate Professor of Economic Dept., Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran

Abstract

 
The touch of the product plays an important role in the final decision of the customer when purchasing from physical and online retail, and the sensations that come to be enjoyed through touch enable them to experience the product from all angles. Therefore, considering the importance of touch, this research has investigated the lived experience of touching the product from the point of view of customers of physical and online stores. The following article is done with qualitative method and phenomenological paradigm. The research community is made up of electronic and clothing buyers from online and physical stores: Technolife, Adak, Havadar and Happyland in Tehran, and through semi-structured interviews, evidence was collected based on the purposeful sampling method. The interviews continued until reaching the theoretical saturation, and in this research, the interviews reached saturation with 15 people. Based on the extracted results, the main themes include; Product perception is physical touch, virtual touch, touch experiences, need for touch and touch perceptions. According to the results, managers of physical and online stores should provide conditions (such as the use of modern technologies) that touch and contact with the product happen to both groups of online and physical buyers so that they can buy products based on their needs and wants, and also this research can pave the way for the development of touch literature for researchers.

Introduction

The touch of the product plays an important role in the final decision of the customer when purchasing from physical and online retail, and the sensations that come to be enjoyed through touch enable them to experience the product from all angles. Therefore, considering the importance of touch, this research has investigated the lived experience of touching the product from the point of view of customers of physical and online stores.
Considering the importance of touch, this research seeks to answer this question: What are the themes of customers' lived experiences of understanding the concept of touch in physical and online shopping?
Literature Review
There is a lot of research in the field of sensory marketing, some of which have focused on the importance of touch and the use of technologies (which create a multi-sensory experience for consumers).)Labrecque, 2020,p:1013؛ Mishra et al, 2020,p:1(.Many researchers have shown that the decision to buy will be positive after specific and positive emotional reactions that occur after touching the product (Hultén, 2020; Krishna, 2013,p:56).
Retail companies recognize that product touch is an essential component of in-store experiences and explicitly encourage consumers to touch their products (Williams & Ackerman, 2011). On the other hand, online stores may use special features (for example, image magnification) to create a sense of tactile contact with products and create a so-called mental simulation with tactile products and create a favorable desire for their products (Overmars & Poels, 2015, p: 17). Meanwhile, touch interfaces may engage consumers with online shopping and influence their purchasing decisions (Chung et al, 2018, p: 795). Analyzed the main drivers for product purchase decisions and the differences between online and offline retailing. She confirmed that most of the consumers search about the product and check it mostly online, but when buying, they tend to go to physical stores (Gligorijevic, 2011). Touch in consumer behavior is a new research area (Jansson-Boyd, 2011a, p: 219), and considering the importance of touch in theoretical literature and its importance in customer decisions, this research has been conducted in this field.

Methodology

The current research is applied-developmental in terms of its purpose and was carried out based on the descriptive phenomenological approach, also practical and practical solutions for solving problems and improving processes were presented. This type of research is done to answer practical questions and meet practical needs (Maxwell et al, 2009, p: 198).
The following article is done with qualitative method and phenomenological paradigm. The research community is made up of electronic and clothing buyers from online and physical stores: Technolife, Adak, Havadar and Happyland in Tehran, and through semi-structured interviews, evidence was collected based on the purposeful sampling method. The interviews continued until reaching the theoretical saturation, and in this research, the interviews reached saturation with 15 people.

Results

The purpose of this research is to discuss how to understand the concept of touch in the process of purchasing product classes from physical (face-to-face) and online stores and to conduct a topical analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. Based on the extracted results, the main themes include; Product perception is physical touch, virtual touch, touches experiences, need for touch and touch perceptions. According to the results, managers of physical and online stores should provide conditions (such as the use of modern technologies) that touch and contact with the product happen to both groups of online and physical buyers so that they can buy products based on their needs and wants, and also this research can pave the way for the development of touch literature for researchers.

Discussion

The present study discusses how to understand the concept of touch in the process of purchasing product classes from physical (face-to-face) and online stores and conducts thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. Based on this, the main theme of understanding the product includes sub-themes: understanding the personality of the product, ease of use of the product, emotional function and cognitive function, the main theme of physical touch of the product, including sub-themes: evaluation of inherent properties by hand touch and evaluation of geometric properties by hand touch, the main theme Touch and tactile perceptions include sub-topics: visual and audio virtual information and textual virtual information combined with sound and image, the content of touch experiences including sub-topics: product knowledge and familiarity with the brand; The theme of customer's need for touch includes sub-themes: instrumental touch and automatic touch, and the theme of tactile perceptions includes sub-themes: trust-seeking measures and compensatory return policy.

Conclusion

The results have shown that people for whom the need to touch is important because of reducing the risk in purchasing, to better recognize the product features, to ensure the usefulness and ease of use of the product, to acquire skills and better process product information by hand before purchasing, touched so that they can have a better evaluation of the product.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the stores and buyers who helped us in conducting the interviews.
 
Keywords: live Experience, product Touch, product Categories, physical and Online Store.
 
 
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Broomé, R. (2‌0‌1‌1‌). Descriptive phenomenological psychological method: An example of a methodology section from doctoral dissertation (pp. 1‌-2‌3‌). SelectedWorks.
  2. Chung, S., Kramer, T., & Wong, E. M. (2‌0‌1‌8‌). Do touch interface users feel more engaged? The impact of input device type on online shoppers’ engagement, affect, and purchase decisions. Psychology & Marketing, 3‌5‌ (1‌1‌), 7‌9‌5‌–8‌0‌6‌. https://doi.org/1‌0‌.1‌0‌0‌2‌/mar. 2‌1‌1‌3‌5‌
  3. Citrin, A. V., Stem Jr, D. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Clark, M. J. (2‌0‌0‌3‌). Consumer need for tactile input: An internet retailing challenge. Journal of Business research, 5‌6‌(1‌1‌), 9‌1‌5‌-9‌2‌2‌.https://doi.org/1‌0‌.1‌5‌0‌9‌/jmkg.7‌0‌.2‌.0‌8‌1‌
  4. Duarte, P., & e Silva, S. C. (2‌0‌2‌0‌). Need-for-touch and online purchase propensity: a comparative study of Portuguese and Chinese consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 5‌5‌:1‌0‌2‌1‌2‌2‌.
  5. Flavián, C., Gurrea, R., & Orús, C. (2‌0‌1‌7‌). The influence of online product presentation videos on persuasion and purchase channel preference: The role of imagery fluency and need for touch. Telematics and Informatics, 3‌4‌(8‌), 1‌5‌4‌4‌-1‌5‌5‌6‌.https://dx.doi.org/1‌0‌.1‌0‌1‌6‌/j.tele.2‌0‌1‌7‌.0‌7‌.0‌0‌2‌
  6. Gligorijevic, B. (2‌0‌1‌1‌). Online retailing versus traditional stores in the purchasing decision making process. In Marketing in the Age of Consumerism: Jekyll or Hyde? Proceedings of the 2‌0‌1‌1‌ Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (pp. 1‌-8‌). School of Marketing, Faculty of Business and Law, Tourism and Leisure, Edith Cowan University. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/4‌9‌5‌9‌5‌/
  7. Gwenaëlle Briand, D., & Cloonan, C. (2‌0‌1‌9‌). A touch of gloss: Haptic perception of packaging and consumers’ reactions. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 2‌8‌ (1‌), 1‌1‌7‌–1‌3‌2‌.doi: 1‌0‌.1‌1‌0‌8‌/JPBM-0‌5‌-2‌0‌1‌7‌-1‌4‌7‌2‌
  8. Hultén, B. (2‌0‌2‌0‌). Sensory Marketing an Introduction. SAGE Publications.
  9. Jansson-Boyd, C. V. (2‌0‌1‌1‌a). The role of touch in marketing: An introduction to the special issue. Psychology and Marketing, 2‌8‌, 2‌1‌9‌–2‌2‌1‌.doi: 1‌0‌.1‌0‌8‌0‌/1‌0‌3‌5‌0‌3‌3‌0‌.2‌0‌1‌1‌.5‌9‌1‌9‌9‌6‌
  10. Jansson-Boyd, C. (2‌0‌1‌1‌b). Touch matters: Exploring the relationship between consumption and tactile interaction. Social Semiotics, 2‌1‌ (4‌), 5‌3‌1‌–5‌4‌6‌. https://doi.org/1‌0‌.1‌0‌8‌0‌/1‌0‌3‌5‌0‌3‌3‌0‌.2‌0‌1‌1‌.5‌9‌1‌9‌9‌6‌
  11. Jha, S., Balaji, M. S., Stafford, M. B. R., & Spears, N. (2‌0‌2‌0‌). Haptic information processing and need for touch in product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 3‌7‌ (1‌), 5‌5‌–6‌4‌. https://doi.org/1‌0‌.1‌1‌0‌8‌/JCM-0‌2‌-2‌0‌1‌8‌-2‌5‌5‌4‌
  12. Kampfer, K., Leischnig, A., Ivens, B. S., Spence, C., & Bruce, A. (2‌0‌1‌7‌). Touch flavor transference: Assessing the effect of packaging weight on gustatory evaluations, desire for food and beverages, and willingness to pay. PLOS One, journals.plos.org 1‌2‌ (1‌0‌), e0‌1‌8‌6‌1‌2‌1‌. doi:1‌0‌.1‌3‌7‌1‌/journal.pone.0‌1‌8‌6‌1‌2‌1‌
  13. Kim, H. W., Xu, Y., & Gupta, S. (2‌0‌1‌2‌). Which is more important in Internet shopping, perceived price or trust?. Electronic commerce research and applications, 1‌1‌(3‌), 2‌4‌1‌-2‌5‌2‌. https://doi.org/1‌0‌.1‌0‌1‌6‌/j.elerap.2‌0‌1‌1‌.0‌6‌.0‌0‌3‌
  14. Klatzky, R. L. Lederman S. J. and Matula D. E. (1‌9‌9‌1‌). “Imagined haptic exploration in judgments of object properties,” Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 1‌7‌ (2‌), pp. 3‌1‌4‌–3‌2‌2‌. https://doi.org/1‌0‌.1‌0‌3‌7‌/0‌2‌7‌8‌-7‌3‌9‌3‌.1‌7‌.2‌.3‌1‌4‌
  15. Krishna, A. (2‌0‌1‌3‌). Customer Sense. How the 5‌ Senses Influence Buying Behavior. Palgrave Macmillan. eBook. https://link.springer.com/book/1‌0‌.1‌0‌5‌7‌/9‌7‌8‌1‌1‌3‌7‌3‌4‌6‌0‌5‌
  16. Labrecque, L. I. (2‌0‌2‌0‌). Stimulating the senses: An introduction to part two of the special issue on sensory marketing. Psychology & Marketing, 3‌7‌ (8‌), 1‌0‌1‌3‌–1‌0‌1‌8‌. https://doi.org/1‌0‌.1‌0‌0‌2‌/mar.2‌1‌3‌6‌6‌
  17. Lee, S.-H., Workman, J.E., Jung, K., (2‌0‌1‌7‌). The influence of need for touch and gender on Internet shopping attitudes among Korean consumers. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 1‌0‌ (2‌), 2‌3‌0‌–2‌3‌9‌.doi: 1‌0‌.1‌0‌8‌0‌/1‌7‌5‌4‌3‌2‌6‌6‌.2‌0‌1‌6‌.1‌2‌5‌0‌2‌8‌7‌
  18. Lee, H. K. Choi D., (2‌0‌2‌1‌). Touch Effect of Mental Simulation in Online Fashion Shopping -The Role of Instrumental and Autotelic Needs for Touch, Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, Vol. 4‌5‌, No. 2‌ p.3‌7‌6‌~3‌8‌9‌.doi: 1‌0‌.5‌8‌5‌0‌/JKSCT.2‌0‌2‌1‌.4‌5‌.2‌.3‌7‌6‌
  19. Lee, H K., and Choi D. (2‌0‌2‌3‌).Can I touch the clothes on the screen? The mental simulation for touch in online fashion shopping, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, Vol. 2‌7‌ No. 3‌, 2‌0‌2‌3‌ pp. 4‌1‌8‌-4‌3‌5‌. https://doi.org/1‌0‌.1‌1‌0‌8‌/JFMM-0‌9‌-2‌0‌2‌1‌-0‌2‌3‌8‌
  20. MacPhail, C., Khoza, N., Abler, L., & Ranganathan, M. (2‌0‌1‌6‌). Process guidelines for establishing intercoder reliability in qualitative studies. Qualitative research, 1‌6‌ (2‌), 1‌9‌8‌-2‌1‌2‌. https://doi.org/1‌0‌.1‌1‌7‌7‌/1‌4‌6‌8‌7‌9‌4‌1‌1‌5‌5‌7‌7‌0‌1‌2‌
  21. Maxwell, J., Bickman, L., & Rog, D. J. (2‌0‌0‌9‌). The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks. doi: 1‌0‌.4‌1‌3‌5‌/9‌7‌8‌1‌4‌8‌3‌3‌4‌8‌8‌5‌8‌
  22. Mishra, A., Shukla, A., Rana, N. P. and Dwivedi Y. K. (2‌0‌2‌0‌). From “touch” to a “multisensory” experience: The impact of technology interface and product type on consumer responses, Psychology & Marketing.; 1‌–1‌2‌. doi: 1‌0‌.1‌0‌0‌2‌/mar.2‌1‌4‌3‌6‌
  23. Nepomuceno, M. V., Laroche, M., & Richard, M. O. (2‌0‌1‌4‌). How to reduce perceived risk when buying online: The interactions between intangibility, product knowledge, brand familiarity, privacy and security concerns. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2‌1‌(4‌), 6‌1‌9‌-6‌2‌9‌. https://doi.org/1‌0‌.1‌0‌1‌6‌/j.jretconser.2‌0‌1‌3‌.1‌1‌.0‌0‌6‌
  24. Overmars, S., & Poels, K. (2‌0‌1‌5‌). A touching experience: Designing for touch sensations in online retail environments. International Journal of Design, 9‌ (3‌), 1‌7‌–3‌1‌.
  25. Peck, J. (2‌0‌1‌1‌). Does touch matter? Insights from haptic research in marketing. In Sensory marketing (pp. 1‌7‌-3‌1‌). Routledge. https://doi.org/1‌0‌.4‌3‌2‌4‌/9‌7‌8‌0‌2‌0‌3‌8‌9‌2‌0‌6‌0‌
  26. Pino, G., Amatulli, C., Nataraajan, R., De Angelis, M., Peluso, A. M., & Guido, G. (2‌0‌1‌9‌). Product touch in the real and digital world: How do consumers react? Journal of Business Research. 1‌1‌2‌, 4‌9‌2‌-5‌0‌1‌. doi: 1‌0‌.1‌0‌1‌6‌/j.jbusres.2‌0‌1‌9‌.1‌0‌.0‌0‌2‌
  27. Ranaweera, A. T., Martin, B. A., & Jin, H. S. (2‌0‌2‌1‌). What you touch, touches you: The influence of haptic attributes on consumer product impressions. Psychology & Marketing, 3‌8‌ (1‌), 1‌8‌3‌–1‌9‌5‌.doi: 1‌0‌.1‌0‌0‌2‌/mar.2‌1‌4‌3‌3‌
  28. Rasty, F., Mirghafoori, S. H., Saeida Ardekani, S., & Ajdari, P. (2‌0‌2‌1‌). Trust barriers to online shopping: Investigating and prioritizing trust barriers in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 4‌5‌(5‌), 1‌0‌3‌0‌-1‌0‌4‌6‌.https://doi.org/1‌0‌.1‌1‌1‌1‌/ijcs.1‌2‌6‌2‌9‌
  29. Rathee, R., & Rajain, P. (2‌0‌1‌9‌). Online shopping environments and consumer's Need for Touch. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 1‌6‌ (5‌), 8‌1‌4‌–8‌2‌6‌. doi:1‌0‌.1‌1‌0‌8‌/JAMR-1‌2‌ -2‌0‌1‌8‌-0‌1‌1‌6‌
  30. Supiyandi, A., Hastjarjo, S., & Slamet, Y. (2‌0‌2‌2‌). Influence of brand awareness, brand association, perceived quality, and brand loyalty of shopee on consumers’ purchasing decisions. CommIT (Communication and Information Technology) Journal, 1‌6‌(1‌), 9‌-1‌8‌. https://doi.org/1‌0‌.2‌1‌5‌1‌2‌/commit.v1‌6‌i1‌.7‌5‌8‌3‌
  31. Van Kerrebroeck, H., Brengman, M., & Willems, K. (2‌0‌1‌7‌). Escaping the crowd: An experimental study on the impact of a Virtual Reality experience in a shopping mall. Computers in Human Behavior, 7‌7‌, 4‌3‌7‌-4‌5‌0‌. https://doi.org/1‌0‌.1‌0‌1‌6‌/j.chb.2‌0‌1‌7‌.0‌7‌.0‌1‌9‌
  32. Venkatesh, V. (2‌0‌0‌0‌). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 1‌1‌ (4‌), 3‌4‌2‌–3‌6‌5‌.doi: 1‌0‌.1‌2‌8‌7‌/isre.1‌1‌.4‌.3‌4‌2‌.1‌1‌8‌7‌2‌
  33. Wai, K., Dastane, D. O., Johari, Z., & Ismail, N. B. (2‌0‌1‌9‌). Perceived risk factors affecting consumers’ online shopping behaviour. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6‌(4‌), 2‌4‌6‌-2‌6‌0‌.https://dx.doi.org/1‌0‌.2‌1‌3‌9‌/ssrn.3‌4‌9‌8‌7‌6‌6‌
  34. Williams, L., & Ackerman, J. (2‌0‌1‌1‌). Please touch the merchandise. Harvard Business Review, 1‌5‌. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2‌0‌1‌1‌/1‌2‌/please-touch-the-merchandise, Accessed date: 1‌6‌ February 2‌0‌1‌9‌.
  35. Yoganathan, V., Osburg, V. S., & Akhtar, P. (2‌0‌1‌9‌). Sensory stimulation for sensible consumption: Multisensory marketing for e-tailing of ethical brands. Journal of Business Research, 9‌6‌, 3‌8‌6‌-3‌9‌6‌. https://doi.org/1‌0‌.1‌0‌1‌6‌/j.jbusres.2‌0‌1‌8‌.0‌6‌.0‌0‌5‌
  36. Yazdanparast, A., & Spears, N. (2‌0‌1‌3‌). Can consumers forgo the need to touch products? An investigation of nonhaptic situational factors in an online context. Psychology & Marketing, 3‌0‌(1‌), 4‌6‌-6‌1‌.https://doi.org/1‌0‌.1‌0‌0‌2‌/mar.2‌0‌5‌8‌8‌