نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانش آموخته دکتری، مدیریت تولید و عملیات، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران نویسنده مسئول: Mehrdad. mehrkam@guest.ut.ac.ir
2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، مدیریت استراتژیک منابع انسانی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران ، ایران
چکیده
مالیات، یکی از جنبههای حیاتی توسعه در کشورها است و نقش اساسی در پیشبرد پیشرفت اقتصادی کشورها ایفا میکند. به همین دلیل، کشورهای مختلف جهان برنامهریزیهای جامعی را برای بهبود و تحول نظامهای مالیاتی خود اجرا میکنند. این مطالعه با هدف ارزیابی سبک رهبری مدیران بر تحول دیجیتال در میان مدیران ارشد و میانی سازمان امور مالیاتی کشور انجام شده است. یک نمونه ی تصادفی شامل 44 نفر از مدیران خبره انتخاب شد. این مطالعه از نرم افزار Smart-PLS برای تحلیل داده ها استفاده کرد و در تابستان 1402 انجام شد. یافته های مطالعه نشان داد که سبک رهبری مدیران و استراتژی تحول دیجیتال بر تحول دیجیتال سازمان مالیاتی تاثیرگذار هستند. به عبارت دیگر مشخص شد که استراتژی تحول دیجیتال به طور قابل توجهی بر رابطه بین سبک رهبری مدیران و تحول دیجیتال نقش واسطه گری دارد نه نقش تعدیلگر.علاوه بر این نتایج نشان داد که سبک رهبری مدیران و استراتژی تحول دیجیتال بیشترین تاثیر را بر تحول دیجیتال دارند. یافته های به دست آمده نشان داده است که فرضیه های پیشنهادی قابل قبول است.
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
The effect of managers' leadership style on digital transformation in the country's tax affairs organization
نویسندگان [English]
- Mehrdad Mehrkam 1
- zakieh nasimi 2
1 Graduated with a PhD in Production and Operations Management Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran Corresponding Author: mehrdad.mehrkam@guest.ut.ac.ir
2 Master's student, Strategic Human Resource Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Taxation is one of the vital aspects of development in countries and plays an essential role in advancing the economic progress of countries. For this reason, different countries of the world implement comprehensive plans to improve and transform their tax systems. This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the leadership style of managers on digital transformation among senior and middle managers of the country's tax affairs organization.A random sample of 44 expert managers was selected. This study used Smart-PLS software for data analysis and was conducted in the summer of 1402. The findings of the study showed that the leadership style of the managers and the digital transformation strategy have an impact on the digital transformation of the tax organization. In other words, it was found that the digital transformation strategy significantly mediates the relationship between managers' leadership style and digital transformation, not a moderating role. In addition, the results showed that managers' leadership style and digital transformation strategy have the greatest impact on digital transformation. have The obtained findings have shown that the proposed hypotheses are acceptable.
Introduction
In today's global landscape, digital transformation is paramount for organizational success. Even government bodies are revamping their tax systems to adapt to evolving environments. However, challenges like skill shortages and resource constraints impede progress. Nonetheless, integrating digital transformation technologies offers numerous benefits, such as enhanced transparency and innovation. Failing to keep up with technological advancements can lead to organizational obsolescence. Thus, thriving in competitive markets requires adeptness in digital transformation, innovation, and emerging technologies, supported by robust implementation strategies.
Literature Review
Digital transformation, as a managerial strategy, revolutionizes organizational operations and processes through the integration of digital technologies. These changes encompass the overhaul of products, business procedures, sales avenues, value chains, and business models. Beyond internal and external organizational shifts, digital transformation extends to establishing a distinct market presence both presently and in the future. Embracing this transformation necessitates the organization's agility in adopting new technologies and implementing comprehensive measures. However, digital transformation initiatives must transcend mere technological integration and instead prioritize process re-engineering and alignment among technology, processes, and personnel. Effective leadership and adept change management capabilities are also crucial components in this transformative journey.
2-1- The relationship between digital transformation and the leadership style of managers:
Digital transformation, as an organizational shift towards digital institutional frameworks, hinges on the legitimacy of the organization's belief system. Managers are pivotal in driving the success of this transformation; through strategic programs and effective leadership, they steer organizations toward digital evolution. The leadership style adopted by managers holds significant sway in this process, with studies indicating that a transformational leadership approach yields positive impacts on both organizational innovation and performance. Consequently, the text proposes a hypothesis asserting that managers' leadership style exerts a positive and noteworthy influence on digital transformation.
2-2- The relationship between digital transformation and digital transformation strategy:
Amidst the era of digital transformation, the significance of a well-crafted strategy for managing institutional change is underscored. Digital transformation is characterized as a dynamic and ongoing process necessitating a thorough reassessment of operations, strategy, leadership capabilities, innovation, and business models. In this context, the formulation of a digital strategy, encompassing both corporate and business strategies, emerges as a primary driver of success in digital transformation endeavors. Consequently, a hypothesis is posited, asserting that the digital transformation strategy exerts a positive and substantial impact on digital transformation outcomes.
2-3- The relationship between managers' leadership style and digital transformation strategy:
This text emphasizes the crucial role of the Chief Digital Officer (CDO) in operationalizing digital strategy and ensuring its alignment with the company's mission and goals. Ineffective implementation of digital strategy by senior managers and employees hinders reaping benefits from digital transformation. Successful utilization of digital transformation requires organizations to develop robust digital strategies and drive digital transformation efforts under senior executives' leadership. The text presents a hypothesis asserting that managers' leadership style significantly and positively affects digital transformation strategy.
2-4- Digital transformation strategy mediation:
The text highlights the significance of a well-designed and efficiently executed digital transformation strategy in guiding organizational digital transformations. Additionally, it proposes a hypothesis suggesting that the digital transformation strategy serves as a mediator in the relationship between managers' leadership style and the organization's digital transformation.
2-5- Moderation of digital transformation strategy:
The text defines digital strategy as a series of strategic IT and information systems actions directed by managerial decisions regarding the utilization of current infrastructure. It suggests that even if managers excel in handling risk and uncertainty, if their actions don't align with existing strategies, digital transformation might not yield desired outcomes. Consequently, the text hypothesizes that the digital transformation strategy moderates the relationship between managers' leadership style and the organization's digital transformation.
Methodology
Type of Research: This research is applied and descriptive-survey in nature, aimed at examining the relationship between managers' leadership style and digital transformation.
Population and Sample: The statistical population includes 50 middle and senior managers of the country's tax affairs organization. Based on Morgan's table, 44 managers with sufficient knowledge of digital transformation processes were selected as the sample. Simple random sampling was used to select the managers.
Data Collection Tools: Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and questionnaires. The interviews aimed to identify the managers' level of knowledge about digital transformation and the existing challenges. The questionnaires included both closed and open-ended questions and assessed various aspects of leadership style and digital transformation strategy.
Findings: The results indicated that the level of familiarity of managers with digital transformation concepts varies, and this difference depends on factors such as work experience and managerial role.
Data Analysis Method: For data analysis, structural equation modeling using Partial Least Squares (PLS) was employed. This method includes two models: the measurement model (examining the relationship between observable and latent variables) and the structural model (investigating the relationships among latent variables).
Results
This study emphasizes the dual nature of digital transformation, presenting both challenges and opportunities for organizations, including government bodies like tax authorities. The implementation of the taxpayer system serves as a successful example of digitalizing tax processes, demonstrating how technology can improve efficiency and transparency while minimizing redundancy. The role of managers in driving digitalization is crucial, requiring adept leadership and strategic approaches. Furthermore, the study highlights the digital transformation strategy's pivotal role as a mediator between managers' leadership style and organizational digital transformation. However, the finding that the strategy does not moderate this relationship suggests a nuanced perspective influenced by research context and environmental factors. Overall, the text underscores the importance of digital transformation for organizational success, advocating for strategic planning, effective leadership, and prudent technological adoption.
Figure 1. Conceptual model
H3
H4
H1
H2
Leadership style of managers
Digital transformation
Digital transformation strategy
5.conclsion
According to the statistical results, one of the factors that influence the digital transformation is the leadership style of managers. Organizational managers directly influence digital transformation; Therefore, managers should provide the necessary platform for moving towards digitalization for the employees and the organization so that the organization can move in this direction.
As the statistical results showed, digital transformation strategy has an impact on digital transformation. When organizations are going to move towards digitalization, they must abandon their traditional processes and change them to modern ones; Therefore, in order to do this correctly, the strategy of the organization needs to be changed and designed according to the new goals of the organization, which is digitization, so that the organization can move in the right direction. In the absence of a suitable strategy, the organization will deviate from its path and digitization will not happen.
Finally, we used a cross-sectional research design while the discussion of digital transformation and digitalization happens over time; Therefore, it is suggested to use a time study to examine the growth of digital transformation implementation and capture the lessons learned over time.
Keywords: Managers' Leadership Style, Digital Transformation, Digital Transformation Strategy, Tax Affairs Organization.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- Managers' leadership style
- digital transformation
- digital transformation strategy
- tax affairs organization
- حسینینسب، سید مهدی، شامی زنجانی، مهدی، و قلیپور، آرین. (1400). ارائه مدل شایستگی مدیر ارشد دیجیتال بهعنوان حکمران تحول دیجیتال در سازمان. پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، 36(3).
- توکلی راد، رضا، و سادات میری، حوریه. (1400). تحولگرایی حکمرانی: از دولت الکترونیک تا حکمرانی دیجیتال. فصلنامه حکمرانی متعالی، 2(3).
- کارگر شورکی، محمد. (1401). مدل شایستگی رهبران کسبوکار با هدف پایداری در عصر تحول. فصلنامه علمی تخصصی منابع و سرمایه انسانی، 2(3).
References
- Altayar, M. S. (2018). Motivations for open data adoption: An institutional theory perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 633–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.07.001
- Ardi, A., Djati, S., Bernarto, I., Sudibjo, N., Yulianeu, A., Nanda, H., & Nanda, K. (2020). The relationship between digital transformational leadership styles and knowledge-based empowering interaction for increasing organisational innovativeness. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(3), 259–277.
- Avolio, B. J. (1999). Full leadership development: Building the vital forces in organizations. Sage.
- AlNuaimi, B. K., Singh, S. K., & Harney, B. (2021). Unpacking the role of innovation capability: Exploring the impact of leadership style on green procurement via a natural resource-based perspective. Journal of Business Research, 134, 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.045
- AlNuaimi, B. K., Singh, S. K., Ren, S., Budhwar, P., & Vorobyev, D. (2022). Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy. Journal of Business Research, 145, 636-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.019
- Biggart, N. W., & Hamilton, G. G. (1987). An institutional theory of leadership. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4), 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886387234003
- Bresciani, S., Ferraris, A., Romano, M., & Santoro, G. (2021). Building a digital transformation strategy. In S. Bresciani, A. Ferraris, M. Romano, & G. Santoro (Eds.), Digital transformation management for agile organizations: A compass to sail the digital world (pp. 5–27). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781786357116-002
- Chierici, R., Tortora, D., Del Giudice, M., & Quacquarelli, B. (2021). Strengthening digital collaboration to enhance social innovation capital: An analysis of Italian small innovative enterprises. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(3), 610–632. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-09-2020-0322
- Correani, A., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Natalicchio, A. (2020). Implementing a digital strategy: Learning from the experience of three digital transformation projects. California Management Review, 62(4), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620901852
- Chanias, S. (2017). Mastering digital transformation: The path of a financial services provider towards a digital transformation strategy. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(6), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0503-2
- De Waal, B., van Outvorst, F., & Ravesteyn, P. (2016). Digital leadership: The objective-subjective dichotomy of technology revisited. Paper presented at the 12th European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance, ECMLG 2016.
- Dacin, M. T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W. R. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069283
- Ferraris, A., Santoro, G., & Pellicelli, A. C. (2020). “Openness” of public governments in smart cities: Removing the barriers for innovation and entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(4), 1259–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00171-2
- Frankowska, M., & Rzeczycki, A. (2020). In Reshaping supply chain collaboration - The role of digital leadership in a networked organization (pp. 353–364). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49444-5_29
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
- Henriette, E., Feki, M., & Boughzala, I. (2016). Digital transformation challenges. Paper presented at the MCIS.
- Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., & Wiesböck, F. (2016). Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2), 103–119.
- Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 28(1), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.01.002
- Li, F. (2020). Leading digital transformation: Three emerging approaches for managing the transition. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(6), 809-817. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-01-2019-0055
- Lipsmeier, A., Kühn, A., Joppen, R., & Dumitrescu, R. (2020). Process for the development of a digital strategy. Procedia CIRP, 88, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.030
- McGrath, R., & McManus, R. (2020). Discovery-driven planning. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1995/07/discovery-driven-planning
- Mikalef, P., Boura, M., Lekakos, G., & Krogstie, J. (2019). Big data analytics capabilities and innovation: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities and moderating effect of the environment. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 272–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12336
- Nadeem, A., Abedin, B., Cerpa, N., & Chew, E. (2018). Digital transformation & digital business strategy in electronic commerce—the role of organizational capabilities. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 13(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762018000200002
- Oliva, F. L., Couto, M. H. G., Santos, R. F., & Bresciani, S. (2019). The integration between knowledge management and dynamic capabilities in agile organizations. Management Decision, 57(8), 1960–1979. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2018-0787
- Porfírio, J. A., Carrilho, T., Felício, J. A., & Jardim, J. (2021). Leadership characteristics and digital transformation. Journal of Business Research, 124, 610–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.021
- Sainger, G. (2018). Leadership in digital age: A study on the role of leader in this era of digital transformation. International Journal on Leadership, 6(1), 1–6.
- Sasmoko, W. M., Alamsjaha, F. L. W., & Elidjena. (2019). Dynamic capability: The effect of digital leadership on fostering innovation capability based on market orientation. Management Science Letters, 9(10), 1633–1644. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.6.012
- Schwertner, K. (2017). Digital transformation of business. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 15(1), 388-393.
- Scuotto, V., Magni, D., Palladino, R., & Nicotra, M. (2022). Triggering disruptive technology absorptive capacity by CIOs: Explorative research on a micro-foundation lens. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, Article 121234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121234
- Siebel, T. M. (2019). Digital transformation: Survive and thrive in an era of mass extinction. RosettaBooks.
- Stefanova, K., & Kabakchieva, D. (2019). Challenges and perspectives of digital transformation. In Conferences of the Department of Informatics (pp. 13–23). Science and Economics Varna.
- Suddaby, R., Seidl, D., & Lê, J. K. (2013). Strategy-as-practice meets neo-institutional theory. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013491000
- Swift, M., & Lange, D. (2018). Digital leadership in Asia-Pacific. Korn Ferry.
- Seepma, A. P., de Blok, C., & Van Donk, D. P. (2020). Designing digital public service supply chains: Four country-based cases in criminal justice. Supply Chain Management, 26(3), 418–446. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2019-0248
- Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
- Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.048
- Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
- Wessel, L., Baiyere, A., Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Cha, J., & Blegind Jensen, T. (2021). Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00672
- Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Press.
- Wixom, B. H., & Watson, H. J. (2001). An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250955
- Wu, W. W. (2010). Linking Bayesian networks and PLS path modeling for causal analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 134-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.002
References [In Persian]
- Hosseini Nesab, S. M., Shami Zanjani, M., & Qalipour, A. (1400). Presenting the competence model of the chief digital manager as the ruler of digital transformation in the organization. Information Processing and Management Research Paper, 36(3).
- Tavakoli Rad, R., & Sadat Miri, M. (1400). Transformational governance: From e-government to digital governance. Transcendent Governance Quarterly, 2(3).
- Shurki, M. (1401). Competency model of business leaders with the aim of sustainability in the era of transformation. Specialized Scientific Quarterly of Resources and Human Capital, 2(3).