مطالعات مدیریت کسب و کار هوشمند

مطالعات مدیریت کسب و کار هوشمند

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

صفحه اصلی

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

تفاهم نامه با انجمن انفورماتیک ایران

راهنمای نگارش

فایل ها

داوران 1399

داوران1403

داوران 1402

داوران سال 1401

داوران1400

راهنمای ثبت نام درPublons

رفتار خریداران و تصمیم گیری خرید با فناوری واقعیت افزوده در کسب‌وکارهای مجازی B2C: مرور بیبلیومتریک و تحلیل محتوا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

2 استاد گروه مدیریت، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران نویسنده مسئول: Feiz1353@semnan.ac.ir

3 دانشیارگروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه بابلسر مازندران، ایران.

چکیده

فناوری واقعیت افزوده به‌عنوان یکی از روندهای اصلی بازار دیجیتال در سال‌های اخیر ظاهرشده است. این فناوری نوین به دلیل جذابیت و پتانسیلی که دارند به‌طور پی‌درپی در کسب‌وکارهای نوآورانه به‌کاربرده شده است. هدف پژوهش حاضر یک مطالعه مروری سیستماتیک و جامع در قالب رویکرد کتاب‌سنجی بر روی داده‌های استنادی ادبیات تصمیم‌گیری خرید مبتنی بر فناوری واقعیت افزوده بوده است. یک پارادایم عملگرایانه به محقق اجازه داد تا در قالب یک استراتژی سیستماتیک داده‌های استنادی را از پایگاه اسکوپوس جمع‌آوری و در قالب پروتکل استاندارد پریزما پیش‌پردازش کنند. درنهایت 239 مطالعه در سبد تحلیل کتاب‌سنجی توسط نرم‌افزار R Studio و Vosviewer قرار گرفت. نتایج نهایی در بخش عملکردی تأثیرگذارترین اسناد، نویسندگان، ژورنال‌ها، سازمان‌ها و کشورها را مشخص کرد و سپس در قالب الگوهای تعاملی بین عناصر و تحلیل محتوای داده‌ها نکات برجسته‌ای را به رفتار خریداران و تصمیم‌گیری خرید با فناوری واقعیت افزوده در کسب‌وکارهای مجازی اضافه نمود. همچنین قابل‌ذکر است که این مفهوم عمدتاً حول پنج حوزه اصلی هست: تجربیات مجازی و روان‌شناختی خریداران در خرید آنلاین با واقعیت افزوده؛ تأثیرات هوش مصنوعی بر فناوری‌های نوین در رفتار خریداران؛ تجربیات مجازی و روان‌شناختی خریداران در خرید آنلاین با واقعیت افزوده؛ تعاملات فناوری، ارزش ادراک‌شده و شناخت بر تجربه خریداران در خرده‌فروشی با استفاده از واقعیت افزوده موبایلی؛ نقش فناوری واقعیت افزوده در تصمیم‌گیری خرید و خریدهای هوشمند در فضازی مجازی. مکتب تأثیرگذار فناوری واقعیت افزوده در تصمیم‌گیری خریداران با نظریه محرک – ارگانیسم – پاسخ مرتبط هست که پایه‌ فکری این حوزه را شکل داده_اند .

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Consumer Behavior and consumer decision making with Augmented Reality Technology in B2C Virtual Businesses: A Bibliometric Review and Content Analysis

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fahime Mahavarpour 1
  • Feiz Davood 2
  • Morteza Maleki Min Bash Razgah 3

1 Doctoral student of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran Corresponding Author: Feiz1353@semnan.ac.ir

3 Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Babolsar University, Mazandaran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

 
Augmented reality technology has emerged as one of the main trends in the digital market in recent years. This new technology has been successively used in innovative businesses due to its attractiveness and potential. The aim of the current research was a systematic and comprehensive review in the form of a bibliometric approach on the citation data of the purchase decision-making literature based on augmented reality technology. A pragmatic paradigm allowed the researcher to collect citation data from the Scopus database in a systematic strategy and preprocess it in the form of the standard Prism protocol. Finally, 239 studies were included in the bibliometric analysis basket by R Studio and Vosviewer software. The final results in the functional section identified the most influential documents, authors, journals, organizations, and countries, and then added highlights to buyer behavior and purchase decision-making with augmented reality technology in virtual businesses in the form of interaction patterns between elements and data content analysis.. It is also worth noting that this concept mainly revolves around five main areas: the virtual and psychological experiences of shoppers in online shopping with augmented reality; The effects of artificial intelligence on new technologies in the behavior of buyers; virtual and psychological experiences of buyers in online shopping with augmented reality; Interactions of technology, perceived value and cognition on shoppers' experience in retail using mobile augmented reality; The role of augmented reality technology in purchasing decisions and smart purchases in virtual space. The influential school of augmented reality technology in buyers' decision-making is related to the stimulus-organism-response theory, which formed the intellectual foundation of this field.

Introduction

Try to conduct marketing without using augmented reality technology; you will not succeed. Try to create an inspiring marketing strategy without augmented reality technology; this will not be effective either. While traditional marketing is effective, it involves high costs and difficulties in engaging and providing personalized services to customers, as it cannot adjust services to recognize customers' needs or expectations. Marketing with this novel technology (AR) represents a new and potentially impactful subfield that has transformed how buyers experience goods and services. Augmented reality aids in the development of marketing, offering benefits that enhance the company's image, strengthen customer interaction, and increase sales. These advanced new technologies have already positively boosted marketing. AR technology is in its early stages and there are ample opportunities for its improvement. This innovative technology (AR) provides an excellent option for enriching perceptual and interactive desires. While many established consumer behavior theories may extend naturally into virtual spaces, many of them may require significant updates to align with buyers' search, selection, and usage practices. During purchase decision-making, whether interacting with physical or online stores, buyers encounter various touchpoints that determine the shopping experience. Academic knowledge is expanding exponentially. This has made it challenging to keep up with the latest innovations in research and evaluate the collective evidence in a particular field of study. One such database is Scopus, created in 2004 and published by Elsevier. Managing such knowledge using traditional tools and techniques is difficult, if not unlikely, due to the rapid growth. This is why literature review as a research method has become more popular than ever in various natural and social science disciplines. The purpose of a systematic review is to identify all empirical evidence that meets pre-specified criteria to answer a specific research question or hypothesis. Bibliometrics is a new style of theoretical literature review and a type of systematic review that has created related theories and bibliometric analysis in various fields of knowledge, including management sciences. The value of bibliometric methods lies in their ability to analyze the evolution of scientific literature over time and reveal intellectual relationships in this field. Therefore, based on the present research problem, which seeks to describe performance indicators, examine the interactive patterns of these indicators, and analyze the content of citation information in the field of augmented reality technology in the academic space, the researcher aims to demonstrate the study gap in this field and contribute to filling the knowledge gap. In the introduction section, a systematic methodology is first defined to specify the steps for collecting, preprocessing, and analyzing information. Then, in the results section, an objective and tangible interpretation is provided using tables and charts from professional bibliometric software. Finally, the obtained results are discussed and concluded within the context of expanding the present literature.

Methodology

Systematic reviews indicate a precise approach to integrating and evaluating scientific evidence literature reviews are no exception and are guided by a systematic process. This process aids researchers in systematically and comprehensively gathering, analyzing, and evaluating existing studies, providing an overall picture of the state and trends within a scientific field. Compared to systematic literature reviews, this method helps prevent author bias. The present bibliometric methodology emerges from a pragmatic paradigm that designs various stages of research based on common assumptions and beliefs among review researchers Based on the outputs of scientific research, the researcher has the freedom to use various quantitative and qualitative approaches within this philosophical framework. According to bibliometric studies, the methodology of bibliometric research consists of five steps, which are detailed below.
Chart 3: The Methodological Process of Bibliometric Studies (Moradi & Miralmasi, 2020b, p. 570)
 

Results

In this study, the focus is on the topic of augmented reality technology and its evolution up to the year 2024. While augmented reality technology saw erratic growth in buyer behavior and purchase decision-making during its nascent stage up to 2015, this was largely due to the limited understanding of its long-term effects owing to the lack of metrics, measurable elements, and research studies at that time.

There is a 50-year span of articles, indicating over half a century of discussion surrounding augmented reality technology. However, from 2015 onwards, it has experienced an annual growth rate of 25.92%, showing an upward trend.
Approximately 36.46% of the research has been authored through international collaborations, as this field requires expertise from various research disciplines.
Developing countries, despite having fewer scientific outputs, publish their articles as international collaborative studies to ensure publication in reputable journals and to increase citations to their studies.

Keywords: Augmented Reality Technology, Marketing, Buyer Decision Making, Buyer Behavior, Virtual Businesses.
 
 
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Augmented reality technology
  • marketing
  • shopper decision-making
  • shopper behavior
  • virtual businesses
مراجع
  1. Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2016). A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 646–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.04.006
  2. Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories. SAGE Open, 9(1), 2158244019829575. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
  3. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017a). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  4. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017b). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  5. Aşkun, V., & Cizel, R. (2020). Twenty Years of Research on Mixed Methods. 1, 28–43. https://doi.org/10.14689/jomes.2020.1.2
  6. Askun, V., & Cizel, R. (2020). Twenty Years of Research on Mixed Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Studies, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14689/jomes.2020.1.2
  7. Bratic Hench, I., Roma, L., Conticelli, F., Bubendorf, L., Calgua, B., Le Magnen, C., Piscuoglio, S., Rubin, M. A., Chirindel, A., Nicolas, G. P., Vlajnic, T., Zellweger, T., Templeton, A. J., Stenner, F., Ruiz, C., Rentsch, C., Bubendorf, L., & Wong, D. (2024). Cell-Free DNA Genomic Profiling and Its Clinical Implementation in Advanced Prostate Cancer. CANCERS, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/‌cancers16010045
  8. Carrozzi, A., Chylinski, M., Heller, J., Hilken, T., Keeling, D. I., & De Ruyter, K. (2019). What’s Mine Is a Hologram? How Shared Augmented Reality Augments Psychological Ownership. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 48, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/‌j.intmar.2019.05.004
  9. Chen, C., Dubin, R., & Schultz, T. (2014). Science Mapping. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Third Edition (pp. 4171–4184). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch410
  10. Creswell, J. W. C. and J. D. (2022). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.
  11. Dacko, S. G. (2017). Enabling smart retail settings via mobile augmented reality shopping apps. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 124, 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.032
  12. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  13. Flavián, C., Ibáñez-Sánchez, S., & Orús, C. (2019). The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience. Journal of Business Research, 100, 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.050
  14. Freeman, J. L., Caldwell, P. H. Y., Bennett, P. A., & Scott, K. M. (2018). How Adolescents Search for and Appraise Online Health Information: A Systematic Review. The Journal of Pediatrics, 195, 244-255.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.11.031
  15. Gallardo, C., Rodríguez, S. P., Chango, I. E., Quevedo, W. X., Santana, J., Acosta, A. G., Tapia, J. C., & Andaluz, V. H. (2018). Augmented Reality as a New Marketing Strategy. In L. T. De Paolis & P. Bourdot (Eds.), Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Computer Graphics (Vol. 10850, pp. 351–362). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95270-3_29
  16. Garaus, M., Wagner, U., & Kummer, C. (2015). Cognitive fit, retail shopper confusion, and shopping value: Empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1003–1011. https://doi.org/‌10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.10.002
  17. Gaur, A., & Kumar, M. (2018). A systematic approach to conducting review studies: An assessment of content analysis in 25years of IB research. Journal of World Business, 53(2), 280–289. https://doi.org/‌10.1016/j.jwb.2017.11.003
  18. Goksu, I. (2021). Bibliometric mapping of mobile learning. Telematics and Informatics, 56, 101491. https://doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.tele.2020.101491
  19. Han, J. J., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (2022). The complexities of consumer empowerment in the modern consumption environment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, 101333. https://doi.org/10.1016/‌j.copsyc.2022.101333
  20. Heller, J., Chylinski, M., De Ruyter, K., Mahr, D., & Keeling, D. I. (2019). Touching the Untouchable: Exploring Multi-Sensory Augmented Reality in the Context of Online Retailing. Journal of Retailing, 95(4), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2019.10.008
  21. Hilken, T., de Ruyter, K., Chylinski, M., Mahr, D., & Keeling, D. I. (2017). Augmenting the eye of the beholder: Exploring the strategic potential of augmented reality to enhance online service experiences. JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 45(6, SI), 884–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0541-x
  22. Hoffman, D. L., Moreau, C. P., Stremersch, S., & Wedel, M. (2022). The Rise of New Technologies in Marketing: A Framework and Outlook. Journal of Marketing, 86(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/‌00222429211061636
  23. Hook, D. W., Porter, S. J., & Herzog, C. (2018). Dimensions: Building Context for Search and Evaluation. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 3, 23. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00023
  24. Jinha, A. E. (2010). Article 50 million: An estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence. Learned Publishing, 23(3), 258–263. https://doi.org/10.1087/20100308
  25. Kietzmann, J., Paschen, J., & Treen, E. (2018). Artificial Intelligence in Advertising: How Marketers Can Leverage Artificial Intelligence Along the Consumer Journey. Journal of Advertising Research, 58(3), 263–267. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2018-035
  26. Kim, J., & Forsythe, S. (2008). Adoption of Virtual Try-on technology for online apparel shopping. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22(2), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20113
  27. Korte, R., & Mercurio, Z. A. (2017). Pragmatism and Human Resource Development. Human Resource Development Review, 16(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484317691707
  28. Lavoye, V., Mero, J., & Tarkiainen, A. (2021). Consumer behavior with augmented reality in retail: a review and research agenda. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 31(3), 299-329.1080/09593969.2021.1901765
  29. Liao, T. (2015). Augmented or admented reality? The influence of marketing on augmented reality technologies. Information, Communication & Society, 18(3), 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/‌1369118X.2014.989252
  30. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
  31. Lichtenstein, A. H., Yetley, E. A., & Lau, J. (2008). Application of Systematic Review Methodology to the Field of Nutrition. The Journal of Nutrition, 138(12), 2297–2306. https://doi.org/10.3945/‌jn.108.097154.
  32. Lim, W. M., & Kumar, S. (2024). Guidelines for interpreting the results of bibliometric analysis: A sensemaking approach. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43(2), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22229
  33. Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/‌0312896219877678.
  34. Maier, D., Maier, A., Așchilean, I., Anastasiu, L., & Gavriș, O. (2020). The Relationship between Innovation and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review of the Literature. Sustainability, 12(10), 4083. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104083
  35. McLean, G., & Wilson, A. (2019). Shopping in the digital world: Examining customer engagement through augmented reality mobile applications. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 101, 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.002
  36. Moradi, M. & Miralmasi, A. (2020). Pragmatic research method.
  37. Moradi, M., & Miralmasi, A. (2020). Pragmatic research method (F. Seydi, Ed.; First). School of Quantitative and Qualitative Research.MPT ACADEMY.
  38. Oyman, M., Bal, D., & Ozer, S. (2022). Extending the technology acceptance model to explain how perceived augmented reality affects consumers’ perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107127
  39. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  40. Pfeifer, P., Hilken, T., Heller, J., Alimamy, S., & Di Palma, R. (2023). More than meets the eye: In-store retail experiences with augmented reality smart glasses. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107816
  41. Poushneh, A. (2021). How close do we feel to virtual product to make a purchase decision? Impact of perceived proximity to virtual product and temporal purchase intention. In JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES (Vol. 63). ELSEVIER SCI LTD. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102717
  42. Rauschnabel, P. A. (2021). Augmented reality is eating the real-world! The substitution of physical products by holograms. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102279
  43. Rauschnabel, P. A., Felix, R., & Hinsch, C. (2019). Augmented reality marketing: How mobile AR-apps can improve brands through inspiration. JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 49, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser‌.2019.03.004
  44. Rese, A., Baier, D., Geyer-Schulz, A., & Schreiber, S. (2017). How augmented reality apps are accepted by consumers: A comparative analysis using scales and opinions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 124, 306–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/‌j.techfore.2016.10.010
  45. Riar, M., Xi, N., Korbel, J. J., Zarnekow, R., & Hamari, J. (2022). Using augmented reality for shopping: a framework for AR induced consumer behavior, literature review and future agenda. Internet research, 33(1), 242-279.1108/INTR-08-2021-0611
  46. Romano, B., Sands, S., & Pallant, J. I. (2021). Augmented reality and the customer journey: An exploratory study. Australasian Marketing Journal, 29(4), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.06.010
  47. Ronaghi, M., & Ronaghi, M. H. (2021). Investigating the impact of economic, political, and social factors on augmented reality technology acceptance in agriculture (livestock farming) sector in a developing country. Technology in Society, 67, 101739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101739
  48. Sands, S., Ferraro, C., Campbell, C., & Pallant, J. (2016). Segmenting multichannel consumers across search, purchase and after-sales. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 33, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.001
  49. Scholz, J., & Duffy, K. (2018). We ARe at home: How augmented reality reshapes mobile marketing and consumer-brand relationships. JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 44, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.05.004
  50. Short, J. C., & Palmer, T. B. (2008a). The Application of DICTION to Content Analysis Research in Strategic Management. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 727–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/‌1094428107304534
  51. Short, J. C., & Palmer, T. B. (2008b). The Application of DICTION to Content Analysis Research in Strategic Management. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 727–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/‌1094428107304534
  52. Singla, J. G., Goswami, J., Pandya, K., Patel, D. K., Patel, V. J., & Holia, M. (2023). Application of digital twin in space engineering using augmented reality and internet of things technology. In CURRENT SCIENCE (Vol. 125, Issue 10, pp. 1126–1130). INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v125/i10/1126-1130
  53. Sjögårde, P., & Didegah, F. (2022). The association between topic growth and citation impact of research publications. Scientometrics, 127(4), 1903–1921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04293-x
  54. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  55. Song, H. K., Baek, E., & Choo, H. J. (2020). Try-on experience with augmented reality comforts your decision Focusing on the roles of immersion and psychological ownership. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & PEOPLE, 33(4), 1214–1234. https://doi.org/‌10.1108/‌ITP-02-2019-0092
  56. Sturmberg, J. P. (2023). Changing the paradigm of research. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 29(5), 726–729. https://doi.org/‌10.1111/jep.13828
  57. Sun, Y., Guo, Q., Zhao, S., Chandran, K., & Fathima, G. (2024). Context-Aware Augmented Reality Using Human–Computer Interaction Models. Journal of Control and Decision, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/23307706.2022.2026260
  58. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
  59. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. In Measuring Scholarly Impact (pp. 285–320). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
  60. Xie, K., & Lee, Y.-J. (2015). Social Media and Brand Purchase: Quantifying the Effects of Exposures to Earned and Owned Social Media Activities in a Two-Stage Decision Making Model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(2), 204–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2015.1063297
  61. Yim, M. Y.-C., Chu, S.-C., & Sauer, P. L. (2017a). Is Augmented Reality Technology an Effective Tool for E-commerce? An Interactivity and Vividness Perspective. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 39, 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.04.001
  62. Yim, M. Y.-C., Chu, S.-C., & Sauer, P. L. (2017b). Is Augmented Reality Technology an Effective Tool for E-commerce? An Interactivity and Vividness Perspective. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 39, 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.04.001
  63. Yoo, S.-C., Drumwright, M. E., & Piscarac, D. (2023). Augmented reality and nonprofit marketing during the COVID-19 pandemic: AR factors that influence community participation and willingness to contribute to causes. In NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT & LEADERSHIP (Vol. 34, Issue 1, pp. 81–106). WILEY PERIODICALS, INC. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21558
  64. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

 

 

‌

 

 

 

‌

مطالعات مدیریت کسب و کار هوشمند
دوره 13، شماره 51
فروردین 1404
صفحه 1-52
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 10 مرداد 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 06 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 24 آذر 1403
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار