نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Operations management and Information Technology, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
E-participation has emerged as a central pillar of digital governance, aiming to enhance citizen engagement, strengthen transparency, and improve accountability in public decision-making. Despite the proliferation of conceptual and empirical models, limited attention has been paid to the dynamic interaction between structure and agency as conceptualized in Giddens’ Structuration Theory. This study analyzes existing e-participation models through a structuration lens in order to assess their theoretical grounding and identify conceptual gaps. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA protocol. Articles were retrieved from high-quality international databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Emerald, and Springer, with a focus on journals ranked Q1 and Q2. After duplicate removal, screening, and quality appraisal using the CASP checklist, 39 eligible studies published up to 2025 were selected for in-depth content analysis. The findings reveal that most models emphasize technological and institutional dimensions, while social, cultural, and reflexive aspects-particularly reflexivity and time-space distanciation- remain underdeveloped. Comparative analysis indicates that existing models can be categorized into structure-oriented, agency-oriented, and integrative approaches. However, only a limited number of studies explicitly operationalize the duality of structure in explaining participation dynamics. This study contributes by (1) synthesizing high-quality interdisciplinary literature, (2) extending Structuration Theory into the domain of digital participation, and (3) proposing a conceptual framework that integrates institutional structures, citizen agency, and reflexive processes within digitally mediated time–space contexts. The findings offer theoretical advancement and practical guidance for designing context-sensitive and sustainable e-participation initiatives.
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Analyzing e-Participation Models Based on Giddens’ Structuration Theory
نویسندگان [English]
- Mohammad Taghi Taghavifard 1
- Molood Mehrabian 2
- Payam Hanafizadeh 2
- Jahanyar Bamdadsoofi 2
1 Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Operations management and Information Technology, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
and enhancing digital governance. However, existing models have paid limited attention to the dual interaction between structure and agency. This study aims to analyze the role of Giddens’ Structuration Theory in the development of e-participation models by integrating insights from high-quality international and national studies. The data were derived from articles published in reputable academic databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, and ScienceDirect, focusing on journals ranked Q1 and Q2. After a rigorous quality appraisal using the CASP checklist, 39 eligible papers were selected for content analysis. The findings indicate that while technological and organizational dimensions are dominant in most models, social and cultural aspects—particularly reflexivity and time–space distancing—have received limited attention. A comparative analysis revealed that structure-oriented, agency-oriented, and integrative models each provide complementary perspectives in explaining the dynamics of e-participation. Grounded in the principles of Structuration Theory, this study suggests the development of more comprehensive, context-sensitive, and practice-oriented frameworks that can strengthen theoretical foundations and enhance genuine citizen participation in digital governance.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- e-participation
- e-government
- structuration theory
- agency
- digital governance
- Abas, A., & Arifin, K. (2023). A systematic literature review on public participation in decision-making for local authority planning: A decade of progress and challenges. Environmental Development.
- Aden, K. (2023). An empirical study juxtaposing the importance of implementing an e-participation model by the government for compliance intention and satisfaction level among Djiboutian Generation Z. Journal of Governance and Administrative Reform.
- Astrom, J., Karlsson, M., Linde, J., & Pirannejad, A. (2012). Understanding the rise of e-participation in non-democracies: Domestic and international factors. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 142–150.
- Cahlikova, T. (2017). The uptake of e-democracy and e-participation in Switzerland: Preliminary findings from semi-structured interviews. IEEE Conference Proceedings.
- Curtin, G. G. (2006). Issues and challenges in global e-government/e-participation models, measurement and methodology: A framework for moving forward. Workshop on E-Participation and E-Government, Budapest, Hungary.
- Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods (pp. 671–689). Sage.
- DESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs). (2022). E-Government Survey 2022: The Future of Digital Government. United Nations.
- Devadoss, P., Pan, S.L., & Huang, J. (2002). Structurational analysis of e-government initiatives: A case study of SCO. Decision Support Systems, 34(3), 253–269.
- Dias Cordeiro, F. C. (2018). A platform for measuring e-participation in smart cities: A case study with Brazilian capitals. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 16(2), 542–548.
- Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press.
- Gronlund, A. (2011). Connecting e-government to real government: The failure of the UN e-participation index. In M. Janssen (Ed.), Electronic Government (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6846, pp. 26–37). Springer.
- Gunter, B. (2006). Advances in e-democracy: Overview. Aslib Proceedings, 58, 361–370.
- Hanafizadeh, P., & Taherianfar, A. (2023). Individual adaptation in the face of enterprise IT changes in organizations. Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy.
- Heinze, N., & Hu, Q. (2005). E-government research: A review via the lens of structuration theory. Proceedings of the Ninth Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2005), 891–904.
- Huss, O. (2024). The social construction of anti-corruption technologies: Analysing the e-participation platform rahvaalgatus.ee in Estonia.
- Kasraei, A., Abedpour, H., & Keramati, M. (1402/2023). Application of Attride-Stirling thematic analysis in examining indicators of the smart city governance model for improving social development based on urban justice with an e-participation approach. Iranian Journal of Social Development Research, 16(1). [In Persian]
- Khadija, A., & Prabin Kumar, P. (2018). Social media usage in e-government: Mediating role of government participation. Journal of Global Information Management, 26(1).
- Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen co-production in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 446–454.
- Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
- Mariani, I., & Mortati, M. (2024). Design thinking as a strategic approach to e-participation. Springer.
- Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7).
- Nahleen, A. (2006). An overview of e-participation models. United Nations, DPADM.
- Porwol, L., Ojo, A., & Breslin, J. (2014). A semantic model for e-participation: Detailed conceptualization and ontology. Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 263–272.
- Porwol, L., Ojo, A., & Breslin, J. (2016). An ontology for next generation e-participation initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 33, 583–594.
- Prashant, P., Nemati, H., & Bagir, N. (2018). ICT for socio-economic development: A citizens’ perspective. Information & Management, 55(2), 160–176.
- Radtke, J. (2025). E-participation in energy transitions: What does it mean? Technological Forecasting & Social Change.
- Randma, T. (2022). Adoption is not enough: Institutionalization of e-participation initiatives. Public Policy and Administration.
- Rexhepi, A., & Filiposka, S. (2018). Youth e-participation as a pillar of sustainable societies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 114–122.
- Rosalia Vicente, M., & Amparo, N. (2014). An empirical analysis of e-participation: The role of social networks. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 379–387.
- Waheduzzaman, W., & Khandaker, S. (2022). E-participation for combating corruption and increasing accountability: A cross-country analysis. Australian Journal of Public Administration.
- Wirtz, B. D. (2018). E-participation: A strategic framework. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(1), 1–12.
- Zheng, Y. (2014). The impact of government form on e-participation: A study of New Jersey municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 653–659.
)