روحانی، س.، زارع رواسان، ا. و دیلمی، ه. (1394). عوامل کلیدی موفقیت پیادهسازی سیستم مدیریت فرایند کسبوکار. فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت کسبوکار هوشمند، 3(12)، 53-76.
Allinson, C., & Hayes, J. (2012). The Cognitive Style Index: Technical Manual and User Guide. Pearson Education Ltd. Retrieved from www.talentlens.co.uk
Allinson, C., Chell, E., & Hayes, J. (2000). Intuition and entrepreneurial behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(1), 31–43. doi:10.1080/135943200398049
Allinson, C.; Hayes, J. (1996, January). The Cognitive Style Index: A Measure of Intuition-Analysis For Organizational Research. Journal of Managmt Studies, 33, 119–135.
Armstrong, S. (2000). The influence of individual cognitive style on performance in management education. Educational Psychology, 20(3), 323-339. doi:10.1080/014434100750018020
Aysolmaz, B., Brown, R., Bruza, P., & Reijers, H. (2016). 3D Visualization Approach for Process Training in Office Environments. Conference On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, OTM 2016 held in conjunction with Conferences on CoopIS, CandTC and ODBASE 2016 (pp. 418-436). Rhodes: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics).
Backhaus, K., & Liff, J. (2007, August). Cognitive Styles and Approaches To Studying in Management Education. Journal of Management Education, 31(4), 445–466. doi:10.1177/1052562905284674
Brigham, K., & Sorenson, R. (2008). Cognitive Style Differences of Novice Serial and Portfolio Entrepreneurs: A Two-Sample Test. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship
Claes, J. (2017). The Structured Process Modeling Method (SPMM) - What is the best way for me to construct a process model? Decision Support Systems, 100, 57-76. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2017.02.004
Claes, J., Vanderfeesten, I., Gailly, F., Grefen, P., & Poels, G. (2015). The Structured Process Modeling Theory (SPMT) - A cognitive view on why and how modelers benefit from structuring the process of process modeling. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(6), 1401–1425. doi:10.1007/s10796-015-9585-y
Claes, J., Vanderfeesten, I., Pinggera, J., Reijers, H., Weber, B., & Poels, G. (2015). A Visual Analysis of the Process of Process Modeling. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 13, 147-190. doi:10.1007/s10257-014-0245-4
Claes, J., Vanderfeesten, I., Reijers, H., Pinggera, J., Weidlich, M., Zugal, S., Poels, G. (2012). Tying Process Model Quality to the Modeling Process: The Impact of Structuring, Movement, and Speed. Business Process Management, 33–48.
Cools, E., Armstrong, S., & Verbrigghe, J. (2014). Methodological practices in cognitive style research: Insights and recommendations from the field of business and psychology. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(4), 627–641. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2013.788245
Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., & Gallo, S. (2006). How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? Data & Knowledge Engineering, 58(3), 358–380. doi:10.1016/j.datak.2005.07.007
Dehnert, J., & Aalst, W. (2004). Bridging the gap between business models and workflow specifications. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 13(3), 289–332. doi:10.1142/S0218843004000973
Figl, K. (2017). Comprehension of Procedural Visual Business Process Models. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(1), 41–67. doi:10.1007/s12599-016-0460-2
Figl, K. (2017). Comprehension of Procedural Visual Business Process Models A Literature Review. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(1), 41–67. doi:10.1007/s12599-016-0460-2
Figl, K.; Recker, J. (2016, March). Exploring cognitive style and task-specific preferences for process representations. Requirements Engineering, 21(1), 63–85. doi:10.1007/s00766-014-0210-2
Green, T., & Petre, M. (1996). Usability analysis of visual programming environments: A ‘cognitive dimensions’ framework. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 7(2), 131–174. doi:10.1006/jvlc.1996.0009
Houy, C., Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2012). Understanding Understandability of Conceptual Models: What Are We Actually Talking about? In P. Atzeni, D. Cheung, & S. Ram, Conceptual Modeling (Vol. 7532, pp. 64-77). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34002-4_5
Laue, R., & Gadatsch, A. (2010). Measuring the Understandability of Business Process Models - Are We Asking the Right Questions? In M. zur Muehlen, & J. Su (Ed.),
International Conference on Business Process Management. 66, pp. 37-48. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20511-8_4
Leymann, F., & Roller, D. (1997). Workflow-based applications. IBM System Journal, 36, 102–123.
Ma, W., Sun, K., & Ma, J. (2012). The Influence of Cognitive Learning Styles on the Use of Online Learning Environments. International Conference on Hybrid Learning (pp. 221–230). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32018-7_21
Mendling, J. (2008). Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction and Guidelines for Correctness (Vol. 6). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89224-3
Mendling, J., Strembeck, M., & Recker, J. (2012). Factors of Process Model Comprehension Findings From a Series of Experiments. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 195-206. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2011.12.013
Mendling, J.; Reijers, Hajo A. (2010). Activity labeling in process modeling: Empirical insights and recommendations. Information Systems, 35(4), 467-482. doi:10.1016/j.is.2009.03.009
Mendling, J.; Reijers, Hajo A.; Cardoso, J. (2007). What makes process models understandable? (G. Alonso, P. Dadam, & M. Rosemann, Eds.) International Conference on Business Process Management, pp. 48–63. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_4
Moody, D. (2004). Cognitive load effects on end user understanding of conceptual models: an experimental analysis. ADBIS 2004. 3255, pp. 129–143. Heidelberg: Springer.
Myers, I., & Briggs, K. (1962). The Myers-Briggs type indicator. Educational Testing Service. NJ: Princeton.
Ornstein, R. (1997). Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest (2nd ed). New York, USA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J., & Tabbers, H. (2003). Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance cognitive Load Theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63–71. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8
Petre, M. (1995). Why looking isn’t always seeing: Readership skills and graphical programming. Communications of the ACM, 38(6), 33–44.
Pinggera, J., Soffer, P., Fahland, D., Weidlich, M., Zugal, S., Weber, B., Mendling, J. (2015). Styles in business process modeling: an exploration and a model. Software & Systems Modeling, 14, 1055–1080. doi:10.1007/s10270-013-0349-1
Poppe, E., Brown, R., Recker, J., Johnson, D., & Vanderfeesten, I. (2017). Design and Evaluation of Virtual Environments Mechanisms to Support Remote Collaboration on Complex Process Diagrams. Information Systems, 66, 59-81. doi:10.1016/j.is.2017.01.004
Razavian, M., Turetken, O., & Vanderfeesten, I. (2017). When Cognitive Biases Lead to Business Process Management Issues. International Conference on Business Process Management (pp. 147-156). Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58457-7_11
Recker, J. (2012). Empirical investigation of the usefulness of Gateway constructs in process models. European Journal Information System, 22, 673–689.
Recker, J., Reijers, H., & Van de Wouw, S. (2014). Process Model Comprehension: The Effects of Cognitive Abilities, Learning Style, and Strategy. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34, 199-222. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b1df/7c01ffe250b69b767acee30b5397ab3c4ecd.pdf
Reijers, H., & Mendling, J. (2011, May). Study Into the Factors That Influence the Understandability of Business Process Models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 41(3), 449–462. doi:10.1109/TSMCA.2010.2087017
Reijers, H.A.; Mendling, J. (2008). Modularity in process models: review and effects. BPM 2008. 5240, pp. 20–35. Heidelberg: Springer.
Reijers, H.A.; Mendling, J.; Dijkman, R.M. (2011). Human and automatic modularizations of process models to enhance their comprehension. Information System, 36, 881–897.
Sanchez-Gonzalez, L., Garcia, F., Ruiz, F., & Mendling, J. (2012). Quality indicators for business process models from a gateway complexity perspective. Information and Software Technology, 54(11), 1159–1174. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2012.05.001
Türetken, O., Vanderfeesten, I., & Claes, J. (2017, June 12-16). Cognitive style and business process model understanding. International Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Information Systems Engineering Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops (CAiSE 2017), 286, pp. 72-84. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60048-2_7
Türetken, O.; Rompen, T.; Vanderfeesten, I.; Dikici, A.; Van Moll, J. (2016). The Effect of Modularity Representation and Presentation Medium on the Understandability of Business Process Models in BPMN. International Conference on Business Process Management. 9850, pp. 289–307. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45348-4_17
Vessey, I., & Galletta, D. (1991). Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 63–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.1.63
Wand, Y., & Weber, R. (2002). Research commentary: Information systems and conceptual modeling—A research agenda. Information Systems Research, 13(4), 363–376. doi:10.1287/isre.13.4.363.69
Zhao, X., & Liu, C. (2010). Steering dynamic collaborations between business processes. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, Cybernetics -Part A: Systems and Humans, 40(4), 743–757. doi:10.1109/ TSMCA.2010. 2044409
Zugal, S. (2013). Investigating expressiveness and understandability of hierarchy in declarative business process models. Software & Systems Modeling, 14(3), 1081–1103. doi:10.1007/s10270-013-0356-2
)