مطالعات مدیریت کسب و کار هوشمند

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات – گرایش کسب و کار الکترونیکی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و اقتصاد، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار، مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و اقتصاد دانشگاه الزهرا (س)، تهران، ایران.

3 مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، دانشکده مدیریت ، دانشگاه تهران، تهران،ایران

چکیده

تنوع دستگاه‌هایی که افراد به وسیله آن به اینترنت دسترسی پیدا می‌کنند و از سامانه‌های مبتنی بر وب استفاده می‌کنند، روز به روز زیادتر می‌شود. کاربران انتظار دارند که سامانه‌ها را روی مرورگرهای مختلف و یا دستگاه‌های مختلف (از دسکتاپ تا تلفن‌های همراه هوشمند در اندازه‌های مختلف) به شکل مناسب و سازگار با دستگاه مشاهده کنند.
هدف این پژوهش نیز طراحی سامانه اینترنت‌بانک واکنش‌گرا است. برای این منظور ضمن مطالعه پیشینه پژوهش و توجه به مفاهیم اینترنت‌بانک، عوامل پذیرش آن و مفهوم واکنش‌گرایی و تجربه کاربری و نیازهای یک سامانه (از نظر کسب و کاری و فنی) به طراحی اینترنت‌بانک واکنش‌گرا بر اساس مراحل روش " علم طراحی" پرداخته شده است. نتایج پژوهش حاضر، طراحی سامانه‌ای واکنش‌گرا را ارائه می‌دهد که می‌تواند مورد استفاده همه بانک‌ها و مؤسسه‌های مالی قرار گیرد. طراحی پیشنهادشده به گونه‌ای است که سامانه روی دستگاه‌های مختلف در اندازه‌های مختلف به شکل مناسب و سازگار با انداره دستگاه نمایش داده می‌شود. بر اساس نتایج این پژوهش، تجربه کاربری که شامل مواردی چون واکنش‌گرایی، سادگی استفاده و قابلیت یادگیری است، بسیار مورد توجه کاربران است و اینترنت-بانک‌هایی که این عوامل را همراه با امنیت و کارایی در اختیار کاربران می‌گذارند، بیشتر مورد اقبال واقع می‌شوند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing a Responsive Internet Banking by Design Science

نویسندگان [English]

  • maryam zolfaghar 1
  • ameneh khadivar 2
  • fatemeh abbasi 3

1 Faculty of social science and economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

2 lAssociate Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Al-Zahra University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Information technology,Management faculty, Tehran university, Tehran,Iran

چکیده [English]

Technology progress, during the recent decades, has influenced the banking industry. Banks have moved from traditional banking to online banking. Users expect to view systems on different browsers or different devices without disrupting the overall/page due to the small size of the display on some devices such. This expectation is responsiveness which is one of the factors influencing the user experience. Responsiveness means that the contents of a web-based system are displayed correctly and clearly on all devices and browsers, regardless of screen size. The purpose of this article is also to design a responsive Internet Banking system based on design science. It has been designed, based on the study of the scientific background and considering the concepts of Internet Banking, its adoption factors, responsiveness and user experience and the system requirements, from a business and technical point of view.
The present study provides a system design that can be used by all financial institutions. It can also be applicable for universities and higher education institutions, as it describes, step by step, how to practically use the research method in a real system.
Considering the results of this study, user experience, including issues such as responsiveness, ease of use and learnability, is much interesting for users, and the Internet banks that provide these factors along with security and performance are very attractive and are highly appreciated.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Internet Bank
  • Responsive
  • Design Science
  • User Experience
  • Internet
  1. Abd Ghani, M., Rahi, S., Yasin, N. M., & Alnaser, F. M. (2017). Adoption of internet banking: extending the role of technology acceptance model (TAM) with e-customer service and customer satisfaction. World Applied Sciences Journal35 (9), 1918-1929. https://doi.org/ 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2017.1918.1929
  2. Aboobucker, I., & Bao, Y. (2018). What obstruct customer acceptance of internet banking? Security and privacy, risk, trust and website usability and the role of moderators. The Journal of High Technology Management Research29 (1), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2018.04.010
  3. Akhisar, I., Tunay, K. B., & Tunay, N. (2015). The effects of innovations on bank performance: The case of electronic banking services. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences195, 369-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.336
  4. Al-Badareen, A. B., Selamat, M. H., Jabar, M. A., Din, J., & Turaev, S. (2010, November). Reusable software components framework. In European Conference of Computer Science (ECCS 2011) (pp. 126-130). Puerto De La Cruz: NAUN.
  5. Ali, A., Alrasheedi, M., Ouda, A., & Capretz, L. F. (2015). A study of the interface usability issues of mobile learning applications for smart phones from the users perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.01875. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1501.01875
  6. AlHaliq, H. A., & AlMuhirat, A. A. (2016). Customer satisfaction with electronic banking services in the Saudi banking sector. Asian Social Science12 (5), 139-146. doi:10.5539/ass.v12n5p139
  7. Almeida, F., & Monteiro, J. (2017). The Role of Responsive Design in Web Development. Webology14 (2).
  8.  Andriole, S. J. (2010). Business impact of Web 2.0 technologies. Communications of the ACM53 (12), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1145/1859204.1859225
  9. Barcellona, J. (2011). U.S. Patent No. 7,917,890. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  10. Baturay, M. H., & Birtane, M. (2013). Responsive web design: a new type of design for web-based instructional content. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences106, 2275-2279.
  11. Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (2003). The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. MIS quarterly, 183-194.
  12. Chiluvuri, R. V. (2015). U.S. Patent No. 9,058,177. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  13. Dekemele, K., Chevalier, A., & Loccufier, M. (2018). ODYSC: A responsive educational web app for dynamics and control. IFAC-PapersOnLine51 (4), 310-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.06.083
  14. Dimitrova, N. G., Van Hooft, E. A., Van Dyck, C., & Groenewegen, P. (2017). Behind the wheel: What drives the effects of error handling?. The Journal of social psychology157 (6), 658-672. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2016.1270891
  15.  Dimitrova, N. G., Van Dyck, C., Van Hooft, E. A., & Groenewegen, P. (2015). Don't fuss, focus: The mediating effect of on‐task thoughts on the relationship between error approach instructions and task performance. Applied Psychology64 (3), 599-624. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12029
  16. Dresch, A., Lacerda, D. P., & Antunes, J. A. V. (2015). Design science research. In Design science research (pp. 67-102). Springer, Cham. http://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-07374-3_4
  17. Durucu, M., Isik, M., & Calisir, F. (2019). What is more important to internet banking website users: usability or functionality?. International Journal of Business Information Systems30 (2), 232-251.
  18. Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., & Abrahão, S. (2011). Usability evaluation methods for the web: A systematic mapping study. Information and software Technology53 (8), 789-817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.02.007
  19. Galliers, R. D., King, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2006). Information systems, the state of the field. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. West Sussex, England.
  20.  Geerts, G. L. (2011). A design science research methodology and its application to accounting information systems research. International journal of accounting Information Systems12 (2), 142-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2011.02.004
  21. George, A., & Kumar, G. G. (2015). Validation of a scale for measuring problems in internet banking and their effect on customer satisfaction. Vision19 (4), 312-323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262915610856
  22. Giurgiu, L., & Gligorea, I. (2017). Responsive web design techniques. In International conference knowledge-based organization (Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 37-42).
  23. Hussain, A., & Mkpojiogu, E. O. (2015). The effect of responsive web design on the user experience with laptop and smartphone devices. Jurnal Teknologi77 (4), 41-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6041
  24. Jameel, A., Shahzad, K., Zafar, A., Ahmed, U., Hussain, S. J., & Sajid, A. (2018, June). The users experience quality of responsive web design on multiple devices. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems (pp. 1-6). https://doi.org/10.1145/3231053.3234632
  25.  Johansson, A. (2016). Security and internet banking: How satisfied are users with internet banking security?.
  26. Kaestner, D., Rustemeier, C., Kiffmeier, U., Fleischer, D., Nenova, S., Heckmann, R.,... & Ferdinand, C. (2014). Model-driven code generation and analysis (No. 2014-01-0217). SAE Technical Paper.
  27. Kuechler, B., & Vaishnavi, V. (2008). On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project. European Journal of Information Systems17 (5), 489-504. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40
  28. Law, E. L. C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A. P., & Kort, J. (2009, April). Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 719-728). https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518813
  29. Ling, G. M., Fern, Y. S., Boon, L. K., & Huat, T. S. (2016). Understanding customer satisfaction of internet banking: A case study in Malacca. Procedia Economics and Finance37, 80-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30096-X
  30. Lochmann, H. (2013). U.S. Patent No. 8,448,132. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  31. Markus, M. L., Majchrzak, A., & Gasser, L. (2002). A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS quarterly, 179-212.
  32. Matsuo, M., Minami, C., & Matsuyama, T. (2018). Social influence on innovation resistance in internet banking services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services45, 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.08.005
  33. Mead, N. R., Viswanathan, V., & Padmanabhan, D. (2008, July). Incorporating security requirements engineering into the dynamic systems development method. In 2008 32nd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference (pp. 949-954). IEEE. http:// doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2008.85
  34. Muhammad, L., & Rana, G. E. (2012). Factors distressing internet banking adoption among adult students: Evidence from kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Business and Management Review2 (1), 76-82.
  35. Nasri, W., & Charfeddine, L. (2012). Factors affecting the adoption of Internet banking in Tunisia: An integration theory of acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. The journal of high technology management research23(1), 1-14.
  36. Nielsen. J. (2003). "Usability 101: Introduction to usability," ed.
  37. Rahi, S., & Ghani, M. A. (2019). Investigating the role of UTAUT and e-service quality in internet banking adoption setting. The TQM Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-02-2018-0018
  38. Riffai, M. M. A., Grant, K., & Edgar, D.. M (2012). Big TAM in Oman: Exploring the promise of on-line banking, its adoption by customers and the challenges of banking in Oman. International journal of information management32 (3), 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.11.007
  39. Paetsch, F., Eberlein, A., & Maurer, F. (2003, June). Requirements engineering and agile software development. In WET ICE 2003. Proceedings. Twelfth IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, 2003. (pp. 308-313). IEEE. http://doi.org/ 10.1109/ENABL.2003.1231428
  40. Paz, F., Paz, F. A., Pow-Sang, J. A., & Collantes, L. (2014, April). Usability heuristics for transactional web sites. In 2014 11th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (pp. 627-628). IEEE. http://doi.org/ 10.1109/ITNG.2014.81
  41. Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Tuunanen, T., & Vaezi, R. (2012, May). Design science research evaluation. In International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems (pp. 398-410). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. http://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_29
  42. Ramamoorthy, C. V., Garg, V., & Prakash, A. (1988). Support for reusability in Genesis. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering14 (8), 1145-1154. http:// doi.org/10.1109/32.7625
  43.  Roto, V., Law, E., Vermeeren, A. P. O. S., & Hoonhout, J. (2011). Bringing clarity to the concept of user experience. In Result from Dagstuhl Seminar on Demarcating User Experience. http://doi.org/10.4230/DagSemProc.10373.1
  44. Rahi, S., Ghani, M. A., & Ngah, A. H. (2019). Integration of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology in internet banking adoption setting: Evidence from Pakistan. Technology in Society58, 101120.
  45. Sachdeva, V., & Chung, L. (2017, January). Handling non-functional requirements for big data and IOT projects in Scrum. In 2017 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering-Confluence (pp. 216-221). IEEE. http://Doi.org/10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2017.7943152
  46. Safeena, R., Kammani, A., & Date, H. (2018). Exploratory study of internet banking technology adoption. In Technology adoption and social issues: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 333-355). IGI Global. http://doi.org/ 10.4018/978-1-5225-5201-7.ch015
  47.  Serener, B. (2016). Statistical analysis of internet banking usage with logistic regression. Procedia Computer Science102, 648-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.456
  48. Shahzad, F. (2017). Modern and responsive mobile-enabled web applications. Procedia Computer Science110, 410-415.
  49. Sharma, A., Grover, P. S., & Kumar, R. (2009). Reusability assessment for software components. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes34 (2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1145/1507195.1507215
  50. Vaishnavi, V., & Kuechler, W. (2004). Design research in information systems.
  51. Van Aken, J. E. (2005). Management research as a design science: Articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management. British journal of management16 (1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00437.x
  52.  Watts, S., Shankaranarayanan, G., & Even, A. (2009). Data quality assessment in context: A cognitive perspective. Decision support systems48 (1), 202-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.07.012
  53. Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R., & El Sawy, O. A. (1992). Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information systems research3 (1), 36-59. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.36
  54. West, R. E., & Williams, G. S. (2017). “I don’t think that word means what you think it means”: A proposed framework for defining learning communities. Educational Technology Research and Development65 (6), 1569-1582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9535-0
  55.  Yu, P. L., Balaji, M. S., & Khong, K. W. (2015). Building trust in internet banking: a trustworthiness perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2014-0262
  56. Zolait, A. H. S., & Sulaiman, A. (2009). The influence of communication channels on internet banking adoption. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting2 (1&2), 115-134.