مطالعات مدیریت کسب و کار هوشمند

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه مدیریت فناوری و کارآفرینی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، تهران، ایران

2 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی‌ارشد، مدیریت کارآفرینی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار، مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

v
پژوهش حاضر باهدف بررسی اثر سه مؤلفه هزینه مبادله شامل عدم‌اطمینان، دارایی خاص و فرکانس بر برون‌سپاری و همچنین، بررسی دارایی خاص و عدم‌اطمینان بر نوآوری باز به خارج، در شرکت‌های فناور مالی بانکی مستقر در تهران انجام گرفته است. در این راستا داده‌های پژوهش با استفاده از پرسشنامه و توزیع آن به روش تصادفی ساده بین 123 نفر از مدیران شرکت‌های فناور گردآوری و با کمک تکنیک مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری و رویکرد حداقل مربعات جزئی مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد بالارفتن دارایی خاص باعث کاهش برون‌سپاری و افزایش صدور نوآوری باز به خارج می‌شود. بالارفتن عدم‌اطمینان سبب کاهش برون‌سپاری و افزایش صدور نوآوری باز به خارج می‌شود. بالا رفتن فرکانس مبادلات نیز سبب کاهش برون‌سپاری می‌شود.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Transaction Cost on Outsourcing and Open Innovation in Technology Companies

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Motiei 1
  • Mina Esmaili 2
  • Davoud Hoseinpour 3

1 ,Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship, Faculty of management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University,Tehran, Iran

2 Masters student, Entrepreneurship, Allameh Tabataba'i University,Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor of Public Administration, Faculty of management and accouting, Allameh Tabataba'i University,Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of three components of transaction costs including uncertainty, specific assets and frequency on outsourcing and also to investigate the specific assets and uncertainty on open innovation abroad among banking financial technology companies based in Tehran. The research method was descriptive-correlational, based on which the required information was collected randomly among 123 managers of technology companies by compiling and distributing a researcher-made questionnaire. The results of the analysis of research data with the help of structural equation modeling technique and partial least squares approach show that the increase of specific assets reduces outsourcing and increases the export of open innovation. Rising uncertainty reduces outsourcing and increases open export exports. Increasing the frequency of exchanges also reduces outsourcing.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Transaction Cost
  • Open Innovation
  • Outsourcing
داوری، علی. (1393). مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری با نرم‌افزار PLS، سازمان انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.
کریمی، سعید، یعقوبی، مریم، آقارحیمی، زهرا، حیاتی آب‌باریک، هادی و محمدی‌بخش، رقیه. (1390). دیدگاه مدیران دربارة موانع، معایب و مزایای واگذاری در مراکز ارائه دهندة خدمات سلامت در اصفهان. مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت، 8(5)، 718-725.
محسنین، شهریار اسفیدانی، محمدرحیم. (1393). معادلات ساختاری مبتنی بر رویکرد حداقل مربعات جزئی به کمک نرم‌افزار smart-pls: آموزشی و کاربردی (چاپ اول). موسسه کتاب مهربان نشر.
References
Alvarez-Suescun, E. (2010). Combining transaction cost and resource-based insights to explain IT implementation outsourcing. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(5), 631-645. ‌ http: //dx. doi. org/10. 1007/s10796-010-9237-1
Aubert, B. A., Rivard, S., & Patry, M. (2004). A transaction cost model of IT outsourcing. Information & management, 41 (7), 921-932. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. im. 2003. 09. 001
Aziz, M. A., Din, B. H., & Abdulsomad, K. (2019). Transaction costs of the zakat institution: An open innovation approach. Institutions and Economies, 43-71.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (Eds.). (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Christopher, M., & Lee, H. (2004). Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management. 34(5), 388-396. http: //dx. doi. org/10. 1108/09600030410545436
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4 (16), 386–405. https: //doi. org/10. 1111/j. 1468-0335. 1937. tb00002. x
 Cox, A. (1996). Relational competence and strategic procurement management: Towards an entrepreneurial and contractual theory of the firm. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 2 (1), 57-70. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/0969-7012(95)00019-4
Crook, T. R., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Combs, J. G., & Todd, S. Y. (2008). Strategic resources and performance: a meta‐analysis. Strategic management journal, 29 (11), 1141-1154.
David, R., Han, S. (2004). A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strateg. Manag. J. 25 (1), 39–58.
Espino-Rodríguez, T. F., Chun-Lai, P., & Gil-Padilla, A. M. (2017). Does outsourcing moderate the effects of asset specificity on performance? An application in Taiwanese hotels. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 31, 13-27. http: //dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. jhtm. 2016. 10. 003
Everaert, P., Sarens, G., & Rommel, J. (2010). Using Transaction Cost Economics to explain outsourcing of accounting. Small Business Economics, 35(1), 93-112. http: //dx. doi. org/10. 1007/s11187-008-9149-3
Ford, D. N., & Sobek, D. K. (2005). Adapting real options to new product development by modeling the second Toyota paradox. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52 (2), 175-185. https: //doi. org/10. 1109/TEM. 2005. 844466
Gassmann, O. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. R&d Management, 36 (3), 223-228. https: //doi. org/10. 1111/j. 1467-9310. 2006. 00437. x
Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E., & Szeidl, A. (2005). Complementarities between outsourcing and foreign sourcing. American Economic Review, 95 (2), 19-24. DOI: 10. 1257/000282805774670518
Grover, V., & Malhotra, M. K. (2003). Transaction cost framework in operations and supply chain management research: theory and measurement. Journal of Operations management, 21 (4), 457-473. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/S0272-6963(03)00040-8
Hafeez, A., & Andersen, O. (2014). Factors influencing accounting outsourcing practices among SMEs in Pakistan context: Transaction cost economics (TCE) and resource-based views (RBV) prospective. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(7), 19-32. https: //doi. org/10. 5539/ijbm. v9n7p19
Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1990). Alliances in industrial purchasing: The determinants of joint action in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of marketing Research, 27 (1), 24-36. https: //doi. org/10. 1177%2F002224379002700103
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource‐based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic management journal, 24 (10), 997-1010. https: //doi. org/10. 1002/smj. 332
Hsieh, C. T., Huang, H. C., & Lee, W. L. (2016). Using transaction cost economics to explain open innovation in start-ups. Management Decision, 54(9), 1-34. DOI: 10. 1108/MD-01-2016-0012
 https: //psycnet. apa. org/doi/10. 1002/smj. 703
Kutlu, A. C. (2012). Outsourcing contracting strategies from supplier's side: A real options approach based on transaction costs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1601-1610. http: //dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. sbspro. 2012. 09. 1147
Lacity, M. C., & Hirschheim, R. A. (1993). Information systems outsourcing; myths, metaphors, and realities. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Lamminmaki, D. (2011). An examination of factors motivating hotel outsourcing. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30 (4), 963-973. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. ijhm. 2010. 10. 010
Langfield-Smith, K. (2008). The relations between transactional characteristics, trust and risk in the start-up phase of a collaborative alliance. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 344-364. https: //10. 1016/j. mar. 2008. 09. 001
Liang, X., Wang, Y., & Tan, K. (2022). Research on the cooperation model between railway company and express delivery company based on the transaction cost perspective. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61(1), 785-794. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. aej. 2021. 06. 009
Memili, E., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2011). Transaction costs and outsourcing decisions in small-and medium-sized family firms. Family Business Review, 24(1), 47-61. http: //fbr. sagepub. com/content/24/1/47
Merkert, R., Mulley, C., & Hakim, M. M. (2018). Trade-offs between transaction cost, operation cost and innovation in the context of procurement and asset specificity–The example of the bus industry. Research in Transportation Economics, 69, 173-179. DOI: 10. 1016/j. retrec. 2018. 07. 015
Michael, B., & Michael, R. (2011). A transaction cost economics view of outsourcing. International Journal of Business, Humanities & Technology, 1(2), 34-43.
Michael, S. C. (2007). Transaction cost entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22 (3), 412-426.
Millar, V. (1994). Outsourcing trends. In Proceedings of the Outsourcing, Cosourcing and Insourcing Conference.
Mollona, E., & Sposito, A. (2007). Transaction costs and outsourcing dynamics: A system dynamics approach. In The 2007 International Conference of the System Dynamics Society and 50 th Anniversary Celebration.
Murray, J. Y. (2001). Strategic Alliance–Based Global Sourcing Strategy for Competitive Advantage: A Conceptual Framework and Research Propositions. Journal of International Marketing, 9 (4), 30-58. https: //doi. org/10. 1509%2Fjimk. 9. 4. 30. 19938
Neves, L. W. D. A., Hamacher, S., & Scavarda, L. F. (2014). Outsourcing from the perspectives of TCE and RBV: A multiple case study. Production, 24(3), 687-699.
Noordewier, T. G., John, G., & Nevin, J. R. (1990). Performance outcomes of purchasing arrangements in industrial buyer-vendor relationships. Journal of marketing, 54 (4), 80-93. https: //doi. org/10. 1177%2F002224299005400407
North, D. C. (1984). Government and the Cost of Exchange in History. Journal of Economic History, 255-264.
Pervan, S., Al-Ansaari, Y., & Xu, J. (2015). Environmental determinants of open innovation in Dubai SMEs. Industrial Marketing Management, 50, 60-68. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/J. INDMARMAN. 2015. 05. 029
Pesch, U., & Ishmaev, G. (2019). Fictions and frictions: Promises, transaction costs and the innovation of network technologies. Social Studies of Science, 49(2), 264-277. https: //doi. org/10. 1177%2F0306312719838339
Schmidt, C. G., & Wagner, S. M. (2019). Blockchain and supply chain relations: A transaction cost theory perspective. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25 (4), 100552. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. pursup. 2019. 100552
Song, F. F., Tan, H., & Wu, Y. (2005). Trade size, trade frequency, and the volatility‐volume relation. The Journal of Risk Finance. ‌, 6(5), 424-437. https: //doi. org/10. 1108/15265940510633497
Steven, A. B., Dong, Y., & Corsi, T. (2014). Global sourcing and quality recalls: An empirical study of outsourcing-supplier concentration-product recalls linkages. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 241-253. ‌ https: //doi. org/10. 1016/J. JOM. 2014. 04. 003
Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., & Vinzi, V. E. (2004). A global Goodness – of – Fit index for PLS structural. In Proceedings of the XLII SIS Scientific Meeting, 1(2), 739–742.
Thakur-Wernz, P., Bruyaka, O., & Contractor, F. (2020). Antecedents and relative performance of sourcing choices for new product development projects. Technovation, 90, 102097.
Van Howell, J. (2019). The Decision to Outsource Technology from a Transaction Cost Economics Theoretical Perspective: A Quantitative Multiple-Case Study (Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University).
West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open‐source software. R&d Management, 36 (3), 319-331. https: //doi. org/10. 1111/j. 1467-9310. 2006. 00436. x
Westergren, U. H., & Holmström, J. (2008). Outsourcing as open innovation: exploring preconditions for the open innovation model in the process industry. In ICIS, Paris, France, Dec. 14-17.
Whitaker, J., Mithas, S., & Krishnan, M. S. (2010). Organizational learning and capabilities for onshore and offshore business process outsourcing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27 (3), 11-42.
Wikhamn, B. R., & Knights, D. (2011). Transaction cost economics and open innovation: reinventing the wheel of boundary. Proceedings of the DRUID, 7(1), 160-174.
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. The Free Press, New York.
Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269-296. https: //doi. org/10. 2307/2393356
 Xu, Y. (2009). Determinants of Outsourcing: Transaction Cost Economics and Core Competencies Theory.
 
References [In Persian]
Davari, A. (2014). Structural equation modeling with PLS software. Jihad Academic Publishing Organization.
Esfidani, M. R., Mohsenin, Sh. (2014). Structural equations based on partial least squares approach using smart-pls software: educational and practical. Mehraban Publishing Institute.
karimi, S., Yaghoubi, M., Agharahimi, Z., Hayati Abbarik, H., Mohammadi Bakhsh, R. (2012). The Viewpoints of Managers about Advantages, Disadvantages and Barriers in Health Care Outsourcing in Isfahan. Health Information Management, 8(5), 77-91.
 
استناد به این مقاله: مطیعی، محسن.، اسماعیلی، مینا.، حسین پور، داود. (1401). تأثیر هزینه مبادله بر برون‌سپاری و نوآوری باز در شرکت‌های فناور ، مطالعات مدیریت کسب وکار هوشمند، 11(41)، 1-26.
DOI: 10.22054/IMS.2022.60737.1959
 Journal of Business Intelligence Management Studies is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..