مطالعات مدیریت کسب و کار هوشمند

مطالعات مدیریت کسب و کار هوشمند

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

صفحه اصلی

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

تفاهم نامه با انجمن انفورماتیک ایران

راهنمای نگارش

فایل ها

داوران 1399

داوران1403

داوران 1402

داوران سال 1401

داوران1400

راهنمای ثبت نام درPublons

راهبرد پایدارسازی مدل‌های کسب‌وکار اَبری: راهنمای کاربردی بر اساس شناسایی و تحلیل شکست‌های آبشاری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی کامپیوتر، واحد آبادان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، آبادان، ایران

2 گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، واحد آبادان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، آبادان، ایران

3 استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم انسانی ، واحد نجف آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، نجف آباد، ایران

چکیده

‌شکست‌های ‌آبشاری ‌یکی ‌از ‌مهم‌ترین ‌چالش‌ها و مخاطرات کسب‌وکارهای ابری ‌است ‌که می-تواند به‌طور زنجیروار به بخش‌های دیگر ‌سیستم ‌آسیب ‌برساند و ‌منجر به ‌فروپاشی ‌کل ‌سیستم ‌شود. هدف این پژوهش بررسی ‌عوامل ‌مختلف ‌مرتبط ‌با ‌شکست‌های ‌آبشاری ‌در ‌مدل‌های ‌کسب‌وکار ‌ابری ‌و ‌معرفی ‌رویکردهای ‌مناسب ‌برای ‌پیش‌بینی، ‌جلوگیری ‌و ‌مدیریت ‌این ‌نوع ‌شکست‌ها ‌است. در این پژوهش، ‌از ‌روش ‌مرور ‌ادبیات با استفاده از پردازش زبان طبیعی برای ‌جمع‌آوری ‌اطلاعات ‌و ‌تحلیل ‌موضوع ‌استفاده ‌شده ‌است. ‌منابع ‌مورد ‌استفاده ‌شامل ‌مقالات ‌علمی ‌معتبر ‌درزمینه ‌فناوری ‌اطلاعات ‌و ‌کسب‌وکار از سال 2015 تا 2024 از دیتاست‌های IEEE Xplore، Google Scholar و arXiv بود که 23 مقاله با روش‌های پردازش زبان طبیعی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. استفاده از تکنیک‌های پیشرفته NLP، امکان ارزیابی دقیق‌تر و تحلیل عمیق‌تر عوامل مرتبط با شکست‌های آبشاری را فراهم می‌کند. همچنین، ریشه‌یابی خطاها و تدوین نقشه راه عملی برای مدیریت بهتر آن ها، به کسب‌وکارها امکان می‌دهد تا بهبود و بهره‌وری در محیط ابری خود را تسهیل کرده و مسیری پایدارتر را در پیش گیرند. این مراحل نه‌تنها به افزایش کیفیت و کارایی خدمات ابری کمک می‌کنند، بلکه هزینه‌ها و زمان مورد نیاز برای رفع مشکلات را نیز به‌شدت کاهش می‌دهند. ‌عوامل ‌مختلف ‌مرتبط ‌با ‌شکست‌های ‌آبشاری ‌در ‌مدل‌های ‌کسب‌وکار ‌ابری ‌به‌طور ‌مفصل ‌بررسی ‌شده ‌است. ‌این ‌عوامل ‌شامل ‌مشکلات ‌فنی، ‌مشکلات ‌مدیریتی ‌و ‌مشکلات ‌بازاریابی ‌است. ‌همچنین، ‌رویکردهای ‌مختلف ‌برای ‌پیش‌بینی، ‌جلوگیری ‌و ‌مدیریت ‌این ‌نوع ‌شکست‌ها ‌معرفی ‌شده ‌است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The strategy of Stabilizing Cloud Business Models: A Practical Guide Based on the Identification and Analysis of Cascading Failures

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maryam Nooraei abadeh 1
  • Soheila Zarin jouy alvar 2
  • Soraya Bakhtiari bastaki 3

1 Professor, Department of Business Administration, Payam Noor University, Tehran, IranM_azami@pnu.ac.ir Corresponding Author: Assistant

2 Department of Business Management, Abadan branch, Islamic Azad University, Abadan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor Department of Management Faculty of Humanities Najaf Abad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najaf Abad, Iran

چکیده [English]

In the digital age where changes are happening at an increasing speed, businesses are steadily moving to cloud models. New business models have many advantages, but at the same time, they are accompanied by new risks and challenges. Waterfall failures are one of the most important challenges that can have many negative consequences for businesses. Cascading failures refer to the occurrence of an unfortunate event in one part of the cloud business model, which can cause chain damage to other parts of the system and lead to the collapse of the entire system. By using appropriate approaches, the probability of these types of failures can be reduced, and if they do occur, they can be quickly identified and eliminated. The purpose of this article is to examine various factors related to waterfall failures in cloud business models and introduction of suitable approaches for forecasting is the prevention and management of these types of failures. In this article, the literature review method using natural language processing is used to collect information and analyze the topic. The sources used included scientific articles in the field of information technology and business from 2015 to 2024 from the IEEE Xplore, Google Scholar, and arXiv datasets, and 23 articles were analyzed with natural language processing methods. The use of advanced NLP techniques also adds a valuable addition to this process and allows for a more accurate assessment and deeper analysis of the factors associated with cascading failures. Also, rooting out errors and formulating a practical roadmap for their better management allows businesses to facilitate improvement and productivity in their cloud environment and take a more sustainable path. These steps not only help to increase the quality and efficiency of cloud services, but also greatly reduce the costs and time required to fix problems. Various factors related to waterfall failures in cloud business models have been examined in detail. These factors include technical problems, management problems and marketing problems. Also, different approaches for predicting, preventing and managing these types of failures have been introduced.
Introduction
Waterfall failures are one of the most important challenges that can have many negative consequences for businesses. Cascading failures refer to the occurrence of an unfortunate event in one part of the cloud business model, which can cause chain damage to other parts of the system and lead to the collapse of the entire system. By using appropriate approaches, the probability of these types of failures can be reduced, and if they do occur, they can be quickly identified and eliminated. The purpose of this article is to examine various factors related to waterfall failures in cloud business models and introduction of suitable approaches for forecasting is the prevention and management of these types of failures. In this article, the literature review method using natural language processing is used to collect information and analyze the topic. The sources used include scientific articles, research studies and reports of reputable organizations in the field of information technology and business, which have been analyzed with natural language processing methods. The use of advanced NLP techniques also adds a valuable addition to this process and allows for a more accurate assessment and deeper analysis of the factors associated with cascading failures. Also, rooting out errors and formulating a practical roadmap for their better management allows businesses to facilitate improvement and productivity in their cloud environment and take a more sustainable path. These steps not only help to increase the quality and efficiency of cloud services, but also greatly reduce the costs and time required to fix problems. Various factors related to waterfall failures in cloud business models have been examined in detail. These factors include technical problems, management problems and marketing problems. Also, different approaches for predicting, preventing and managing these types of failures have been introduced. The stages of this research to investigate the factors of cascading failures in cloud business models are as follows:

Examining the factors of cascading failures: In this step, various factors that lead to the occurrence of cascading failures in cloud business models are identified and investigated. It includes the examination of technical, operational, managerial and organizational factors, which are more important in cloud environments.
Error rooting: In this step, the rooting of errors in cloud business models is discussed. It is possible to accurately analyze errors and determine their sources and causes, including problems related to infrastructure, software, resource management, security, and other factors.
Presentation of error management methodology: In this phase, a suitable methodology is presented to manage errors in the cloud business. This methodology includes processes, methods and tools used to identify, track, evaluate and fix errors in cloud business models.
Providing a qualitative model for the analysis of cascading failures: In this step, we present a qualitative model for analyzing cascading failures in cloud business models. This model includes various factors that can lead to cascading failures in cloud business models, and provides methods and solutions to prevent and manage these failures.
Compilation of a practical road map for managing cascading failures in cloud business: In this section, the formulation of strategies, goals and expectations from the road map, as well as the selection of suitable solutions to reduce the probability and negative effects of cascading failures, are discussed.

By using a qualitative model, it is possible to provide a more accurate methodology for managing errors and solving problems in the cloud business model, and make a significant improvement in the performance and stability of the cloud business model. Also, by considering the priority features according to the qualitative model, there were significant improvements in the performance and sustainable use of the cloud business model. These improvements can include improving efficiency, increasing reliability, increasing security, and maintaining compliance with changes and customer needs.
Literature Review
The emergence of Industry 4.0 and related technologies (cyber-physical systems, Internet of Things, cloud computing and big data) creates the potential for SMEs stakeholders to compete in a highly competitive global market (Argyroudis et al., 2022). However, as machines, devices, services, and software become heterogeneous and hyperconnected along the cyber supply chain, SMB stakeholders must better understand the potential threats associated with this new business landscape (Rogers, 2023). Bull's (2021) research provides a glimpse of small and medium businesses from the perspective of cyber threats related to key technologies that have become prerequisites for entering this new industrial revolution and cyber supply chain.
Research objective
The aim of this research is to investigate various factors related to waterfall failures in cloud business models and to introduce appropriate approaches for predicting, preventing and managing these types of failures.
Methodology
The stages of this research to investigate the factors of cascading failures in cloud business models, are:
Examining the factors of cascading failures.
Rooting errors.
Presentation of error management methodology.
Presenting a qualitative model of cascade failure analysis.
Developing a practical roadmap for managing cascade failures in cloud business.
Conclusion
Today, the use of online cloud data storage as a solution to preserve data and ensure continuous access to it by individuals and organizations is increasing day by day; But to provide this service, cloud providers need to provide equipment, infrastructure, strong human resources and high potential to prevent and manage cascading failures to ensure security and continuous availability. In fact, every second of data center downtime can damage reputation and revenue. Also, cloud storage as a backup solution, recovery and data rescue service is essential in the industry for a long time. Cascading business failures refer to a series of interconnected failures in a company that can lead to a chain reaction of negative consequences. These failures can start with a single issue, but quickly spread throughout the organization, affecting different aspects of its operations, potentially leading to business failure.
Keywords: Cascading Failures, Business Models, Cloud Models, Prediction.
 
 
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • cascading failures
  • business models
  • cloud models
  • prediction
مراجع
  1. Aagaard, A. (2019). "The Concept and Frameworks of Digital Business Models," in Digital Business Models: Driving Transformation and Innovation, A. Aagaard, Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96902-2_1
  2. Abdelkafi, N., Makhotin, S., Posselt, T. (2013). "Business Model Innovations For Electric Mobility — What Can Be Learned From Existing Business Model Patterns?," International Journal of Innovation Management, 17, no. 01, p. 1340003. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919613400033.
  3. Adamu, H., Mohammed, B., Maina, A. B., Cullen, A., Ugail, H., Awan, I., (2017). "An approach to failure prediction in a cloud based environment," in 2017 IEEE 5th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud), pp. 191-197: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/FiCloud.2017.56
  4. Almeida, F., Wasim, J. (2023). "The role of data-driven solutions for SMES in responding to COVID-19," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 20, no. 01, p. 2350001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877023500013.
  5. Almeida, F. (2024). "Causes of Failure of Open Innovation Practices in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Administrative Sciences, 14, no. 3, p. 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14030050.
  6. Argyroudis, S. A. et al. (2022) "Digital technologies can enhance climate resilience of critical infrastructure," Climate Risk Management, vol. 35, p. 100387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100387 .
  7. Aouni, F. E., K. Moumane, A. Idri, M. Najib and S. U. Jan (2025). "A systematic literature review on Agile, Cloud, and DevOps integration: Challenges, benefits." Information and Software Technology 177: 107569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107569
  8. Bauer, E., Adams, R. (2012). Reliability and availability of cloud computing. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
  9. Bertels, H. M., Koen, P. A., Elsum, I. (2015). "Business models outside the core: Lessons learned from success and failure," Research-Technology Management, 58, no. 2, pp. 20-29. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5802294.
  10. Brenk, S., Lüttgens, D., Diener, K., Piller, F. (2019). "Learning from failures in business model innovation: solving decision-making logic conflicts through intrapreneurial effectuation," Journal of Business Economics, 89, pp. 1097-1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-019-00954-1 .
  11. Broccardo, L., Zicari, A., Jabeen, F., Bhatti, Z. A. (2023). "How digitalization supports a sustainable business model: A literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, p. 122146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122146 .
  12. Bull, D. M. (2021). "Threat Landscape 4.0: An Analysis of Four Key Industry 4.0-Cyber Supply Chain Technologies and Threats to SMEs,", Master's thesis, Utica College.
  13. Cedillo, P., J. Gonzalez-Huerta, S. Abrahao and E. Insfran (2016). A monitoring infrastructure for the quality assessment of cloud services. Transforming Healthcare Through Information Systems: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Information Systems Development, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30133-4_2 
  14. Dong, H., Wang, B. (2022). "Direct and Configurational Paths of Strategic Orientation and Business Model Innovation to Successful Enterprise Performance," IEEE Access, 10, pp. 72671-72686. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3189772.
  15. Fu, X., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., Postolache, O. (2022) "Analysis on cascading reliability of edge-assisted Internet of Things," Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 223, p. 108463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108463 .
  16. Garraghan, et al. (2018). "Emergent failures: Rethinking cloud reliability at scale," IEEE Cloud Computing, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcc.2018.053711662 .
  17. Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Grybauskas, A., Vilkas, M., Petraitė, M. (2021). "Industry 4.0, innovation, and sustainable development: A systematic review and a roadmap to sustainable innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, no. 8, pp. 4237-4257. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2867 .
  18. Gill, S. S., Buyya, R. (2018). "Failure management for reliable cloud computing: a taxonomy, model, and future directions," Computing in Science & Engineering, 22, no. 3, pp. 52-63. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcse.2018.2873866 .
  19. Godavarthi, B., Narisetty, N., Gudikandhula, K., Muthukumaran, R., Kapila, D., Ramesh, J. V. N. (2023). "Cloud computing enabled business model innovation," The Journal of High Technology Management Research, vol. 34, no. 2, p. 100469. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003255529-8 .
  20. Godavarthi, S. (2021). "AI business model: an integrative business approach," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10, no. 1, p. 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-021-00157-5 .
  21. Jhawar, R., Piuri, V. (2017). "Fault tolerance and resilience in cloud computing environments," in Computer and information security handbook: Elsevier, pp. 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-394397-2.00007-6 .
  22. Jorzik, P., Yigit, A., D. Kanbach, K., Kraus, S., Dabić, M. (2024). "Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Business Model Innovation: Competencies and Roles of Top Management," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 71, pp. 7044-7056. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2023.3275643
  23. Li, X.-Y., Liu, Y., Lin, Y.-H., Xiao, L.-H., Zio, E., Kang, R. (2021). "A generalized petri net-based modeling framework for service reliability evaluation and management of cloud data centers," Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 207, p. 107381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107381 .
  24. Morino, Y., Miwa. H. (2020). "Method by Protection to Reduce Probability of Cascade Failure," Cham, 2020, pp. 566-575: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44038-1_52 .
  25. Neicu, A.-I., Radu, A.-C., Zaman, G., Stoica, I., Răpan, F. (2020). "Cloud computing usage in SMEs. An empirical study based on SMEs employees perceptions," Sustainability, 12, no. 12, p.4960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124960 .
  26. Niosi, J., McKelvey, M. (2018). "Relating business model innovations and innovation cascades: the case of biotechnology," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28, no. 5, pp. 1081-1109. DOI: 10.1007/s00191-018-0561-9
  27. Prathiba, S., Sowvarnica, S. (2017). "Survey of failures and fault tolerance in cloud," in 2017 2nd International Conference on Computing and Communications Technologies (ICCCT), pp. 169-172: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccct2.2017.7972271 .
  28. Prokhorenko, V., Babar, M. A. (2020). "Architectural Resilience in Cloud, Fog and Edge Systems: A Survey," IEEE Access, 8, pp. 28078-28095. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2971007
  29. Qasem, Y. A. M., Abdullah, R., Yah, Y., Atan, R., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Al-Emran, M. (2021). "Towards the Development of a Comprehensive Theoretical Model for Examining the Cloud Computing Adoption at the Organizational Level," in Recent Advances in Intelligent Systems and Smart Applications, M. Al-Emran, K. Shaalan, and A. E. Hassanien, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47411-9_4
  30. Ranta, V., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Väisänen, J.M. (2021). "Digital technologies catalyzing business model innovation for circular economy—Multiple case study," Resources, conservation and recycling, 164, p. 105155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105155 .
  31. Rogers, D. (2023). The Digital Transformation Roadmap: Rebuild Your Organization for Continuous Change. Columbia University Press.
  32. Rui, L., Wang, X., Qiu, X. (2018). "Analysis of Cascade Fault Optimization Based on Regional Fault and Traffic Reallocation in Complex Networks," IEEE Access, 6, pp. 24818-24828. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2829979
  33. Santos, L. et al. (2017). "Analyzing the it subsystem failure impact on availability of cloud services," in 2017 IEEE symposium on computers and communications (ISCC), pp. 717-723: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iscc.2017.8024612 .
  34. Saratchandra, M., Shrestha, A., Murray, P. A. (2022). "Building knowledge ambidexterity using cloud computing: Longitudinal case studies of SMEs experiences," International Journal of Information Management, 67, p. 102551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102551
  35. Simone, L. D. (2014). "Towards Fault Propagation Analysis in Cloud Computing Ecosystems," in 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops, pp. 156-161. DOI: 10.1109/ISSREW.2014.47
  36. Taylor, A. (2021). "Standing by for data loss: Failure, preparedness and the cloud," ephemera: theory & politics in organization, 21, no. 1.
  37. Teece, D. J. (2018). "Business models and dynamic capabilities" Long Range Planning, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 40-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
  38. Thompson, V. A. (1965). "Bureaucracy and Innovation," Administrative Science Quarterly, 10, no. 1, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391646 .
  39. Troisi, O., Visvizi, A., Grimaldi, M. (2023). "Digitalizing business models in hospitality ecosystems: toward data-driven innovation," European Journal of Innovation Management, 26, no. 7, pp. 242-277. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-09-2022-0540 .
  40. Wang, H., Shen, H., Li, Z. (2018). "Approaches for resilience against cascading failures in cloud datacenters," in 2018 IEEE 38th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), pp. 706-717: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109‌/icdcs.‌2018.00074 .
  41. Wang, et al. (2018). "Impacts of operators’ behavior on reliability of power grids during cascading failures," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 6013-6024. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2018.2825348. 
  42. Xing, L. (2020). "Cascading failures in internet of things: review and perspectives on reliability and resilience," IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8, no. 1, pp. 44-64. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.‌2020.3018687 

 

 

‌

 

 

 

 

مطالعات مدیریت کسب و کار هوشمند
دوره 13، شماره 49
مهر 1403
صفحه 159-206
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 29 تیر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 31 شهریور 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 10 مهر 1403
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار